Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grady

I really don’t think the Racine case is the same, though.

At any rate, I think the police will win this one, even though they shouldn’t.

I think we have just about exhausted the topic unless new info comes up.


222 posted on 09/23/2010 8:55:35 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: ltc8k6

Why do you think the Racine case is different? Did you read the entire article?

Why do you think the police will win this one? From what information have you deduced this? Or is that strictly your opinion based on your stellar comprehension of the law?


224 posted on 09/23/2010 9:01:41 AM PDT by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

To: ltc8k6
Since you're bowing out without having told us, or even attempted to tell us:

1. What basis was there to reasonably suspect that these gentlemen were felons, or

2. What basis was there to reasonably suspect that these gentlemen were acting disorderly

I'll take this as your concession that you have no actual facts or sound reasoning to back your opinion that the officers in this case were acting within the scope of their authority under the ID statute.

225 posted on 09/23/2010 9:01:55 AM PDT by grady ("Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading." - Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson