[grady]

Since you're bowing out without having told us, or even attempted to tell us:

1. What basis was there to reasonably suspect that these gentlemen were felons, or

2. What basis was there to reasonably suspect that these gentlemen were acting disorderly

I'll take this as your concession that you have no actual facts or sound reasoning to back your opinion that the officers in this case were acting within the scope of their authority under the ID statute.

[ltc8k6]

“Since you’re bowing out without having told us, or even attempted to tell us:
1. What basis was there to reasonably suspect that these gentlemen were felons, or

2. What basis was there to reasonably suspect that these gentlemen were acting disorderly

I’ll take this as your concession that you have no actual facts or sound reasoning to back your opinion that the officers in this case were acting within the scope of their authority under the ID statute.”

For the record, I believe I have answered both of those more than once. I think the police were using the DC law and the Stop and ID law to ask for ID, and that the use was bogus.

Also, I never said a word about anyone being felons. I’m fairly certian that this post is my first use of the word on the topic.