Pissant pointed out elsewhere in this thread that the agenda mentions not just the repeal but the replacement of Obamacare (by Republicans, of course).
Replacement? What the hell?
Such a statement indicates that the Republican leadership simply doesn't get it. Americans don't want to keep jockeying between two political overlords, as they have been for decades; they want government to get out of their way, period.
As a result, I think that this "agenda" is nothing more than a half-hearted attempt to appease angry Tea Partiers into putting down their rhetorical torches and pitchforks and returning to the Republican plantation.
To be honest, I don't want more empty promises. I want heads to roll, politically speaking.
As I scanned the thing, I saw the verbiage and Pissant is correct. There was talk of replacing it with something better.
If we’re talking about private sector better, I’m going to feel a lot better about it. If we’re talking about a government run plan, these jackasses will have signed on to an unconstitutional mess that is as big a pig in a poke as the Democrats brainstorm was.
Heads to roll is good. Admission, restitution, and corrective measures are a must.
If we start savings accounts that will make it possible for people to self-insure, cover low out of pocket needs, and can be used for retirement as well, I think we’re on to something.
If it becomes theft where your funds are taken away and spend to pay another group of people, it’s going to be a big a boondoggle as Social Security is.