Posted on 09/18/2010 7:37:20 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
First lady Hillary Rodham Clinton held imaginary conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt and Mahatma Gandhi as a therapeutic release, according to a new book written by Bob Woodward, says a report in Sunday's edition of The Chicago Sun-Times...Woodward says the adviser was Jean Houston, co-director of the Foundation for Mind Research, which he describes as a group that studies the psychic experience and altered and expanded consciousness.
(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...
I’ll bet Vince Foster could raddle her Voo doo .
Yess, as I recall, one of those she “talked” with “regularly” was a popular niece of Theodore Roosevelt.
I guess Billy was too busy releasing other young ladies and didn’t have time to release Hillary once in a while. Least he could have done was give her a cigar and explain how to use it.
***Hitlery Clinton also dabbled in talking with dead people by some psychic kooks. ****
And Nancy Reagan often consulted with a psychic, but so did the FDR admin to counter Hitler’s reliance on astrologers.
And I read Jean Dixon years ago and had a copy of Criswell Predicts!
Sarah Palin PRAYS! She *PRAYS*! She talks to PRAYER WARRIORS!!!
***Paging Bill Maher!***
As long as it was not Ramtha! ;-D
Not only do people speak aloud to their family passed but on the Other Side, they often find a way to speak back.
In many different ways, meaningful songs popping up at odd times, phones ringing with no one on the other line, dreams are a big one and sometimes other ways including hearing things.
Although most people don’t like to discuss, it’s far more common that many people are willing to admit. It’s the silent majority of today.
Discovered it after a loss myself. Never expected it.
Now about Hillary, that’s something different. lol
What’s all the hub bub? Hilary is simply speaking with a captive audience of reliable Dem voters.
Hilary to dead, “So I can count on you for your vote.”
I was on a plane with a girl that collected crystals for power. She showed me her crystals and I told her they are pretty rocks. She lost interest in me and I lost interest in her.
There must be somebody the DNC has to stage for 2012 other than Obama and Hillary.
Or...Obama is getting back at her in early primary leaks.
I hope Vince Foster comes to see her, in chains...
From last year...
No.10 turns on Obama and Clinton for criticising decision to release Lockerbie bomber
British officials claim Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton were kept informed at all stages of discussions concerning Megrahi’s return.
And the 'Rats on the Hill scuttled any hearings.
If the Pubbies gain control of Congress and they don't get to the bottom of the admin's role in the Lockerbie deal, there's going to be more even more hell to pay...
Please help me out a little here...how does criticizing Hill's stand against the release of the monster hurt her? I'm missing something...
I am a recovering democrat, too. But viewing all this sexist hate in these comments heaped on Hillary, AGAIN, does not make conservatives look a bit appealing. They look like Palin-hating obots. Great. People will never get it.
Oh well. I shouldn’t be surprised or disappointed—even though I am. Republicans and democrats are really one in the same.
My purpose in starting this thread was to show how Hitlery engaged in worse behavior than Christine O’Donnell, who is getting beaten up by so-called conservatives right now. They are reacting to a silly video from 11 years ago where she was on a talk show talking about witchcraft.
Hitlery was a First Lady when she did this “talking to the dead” nonsense.
Is that anything like witchcraft?
>> “That’s different. The dead vote for Democrats, so their politicians should at least talk with them.” <<
That is awesome. (and sad at the same time because it’s true ...)
I saw the O’Donnell crap, too.
Yes, it’s hypocritical. But, let’s be honest, Mahr hates Hillary, too. Hillary has nothing to do with this smear.
My question is whether or not Mahr told O’Donnell in the moment that the witchcraft story reflected poorly on her character and did he give off the impression that he took it very seriously? I doubt it, so why should anyone else?
The video clip was edited to omit Mahr’s reaction, but it seemed he was chuckling at the humor of it, not taking it seriously as a reflection on O’Donnell.
He’s a pig, but Hillary has nothing to do with it.
according to a new book written by Bob Woodward...and I quit reading right there. Thanks Recovering_Democrat.
Didn’t Eleanor Roosevelt do that as well?
Picture Bill with that sick little smirk ...
You see, you get five or six young whitehouse aids, close the drapes, turn out the lights .....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.