“Still has absolutely nothing to do with the title: it doesn’t say where /when /how CA paid him $4.5 mil to rape kids. He didn’t want to rape them for less than $4.5 million or what?
Or maybe the sensational headline is factually wrong?”
Okay, so you don’t like the way the thing is worded, and THAT is the only outrage you can muster over this story???
Really?
Headline makes no sense.
As for the story it was posted yesterday too. Looks like the state felt that they had to settle because he was harmed while in custody and, is alive, on expensive care. If he was dead probably $100K would have sufficed.
Bottom line is that the state can be held responsible for what happens in jail, the punishment for child molestation...drunk driving....writing back checks etc doesn’t include beatings, killings and rapes.
Justice would be done if the victim sued and got every penny from this scumbag.