Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 12 September 2010
Various driveby media television networks ^ | 12 September 2010 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 09/12/2010 5:09:23 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, September 12th, 2010

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Austan Goolsbee, newly named chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers; Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga.; Washington Redskins coach Mike Shanahan.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): White House adviser David Axelrod; former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, R-N.Y.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio; Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn.; former New Jersey Gov. Tom Kean, co-chairman, 9-11 commission.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Goolsbee; Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, leader of effort to build Islamic center and mosque near ground zero; Eboo Patel, president, Interfaith Youth Core; Irshad Manji, author and New York University professor; the Rev. Richard Cizik, founder, The New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good.

STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Former Rep. Dick Armey, R-Texas; former Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guests; lineup; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-359 next last
To: rodguy911

total distortion of how Raines, Dodd, Barney fag and others created the housing crisis that Bush tried to stop

Housing is 10% of the economy


101 posted on 09/12/2010 7:27:01 AM PDT by Son House (Like Getting Liposuction, and Coming Out Fatter. Time to Convict Democrats of Economic Malpractice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
And speaking of David Gregory, from 2008....

NBC DAVID GREGORY WIFE'S FANNIE MAE FIXER

102 posted on 09/12/2010 7:27:02 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Crawdad

LOL!


103 posted on 09/12/2010 7:27:17 AM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie ( Ok, Joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
the contrast between Axelrod and Guilliani is striking!!!

This (Axelrod) was one of the worst performances by any Obama spokesman...ever.

104 posted on 09/12/2010 7:27:17 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

Gregory plays video of Schumer saying the dem’s health care vote will be an asset for dem’s in the November elections. lololol

Axelrod - health care isn’t driving the outcome for these elections - it’s the economy.


105 posted on 09/12/2010 7:27:22 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
Do we prefer Boehner to this? Is that the question Axelrod?


106 posted on 09/12/2010 7:27:44 AM PDT by csmusaret (The Obama/Pelosi/Reid Cartel has saddled each of my grandchildren with a $44,000 debt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: bray

The same can be said concerning the O&G industry. I laugh wondering how these leftists could exist without all the rubber and plastic goods they use daily without realizing each contains petroleum. From tennis shows to toothpaste to everything plastic.


107 posted on 09/12/2010 7:28:21 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: the law of unintended consequences in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Yes I did Ab and thanks.

Fishtalk has all the skinny on the race and she knows both candidates inside out. I trust her judgment.

Having read what I have I truly believe that Christine O'Donnell is the best and only hope for all conservatives and that we run a huge risk with a Castle win.

It's possible that he might turn rat and only be saving the seat for Beau Biden. We already know how he will vote,either scenario is a disaster for us.

108 posted on 09/12/2010 7:28:36 AM PDT by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

the irony here is that this is actually how Libs think....we just never see it put out there as emotional and crazy as this...once in awhile.


109 posted on 09/12/2010 7:28:36 AM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie ( Ok, Joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

8.”We saved three and a half million jobs”

Go to recovery.gov and you have to add every quarter to come up with a figure even close, I think it’s like 2.5 million, and 90% weren’t in the private sector, saying that was just a con job.


110 posted on 09/12/2010 7:29:41 AM PDT by Son House (Like Getting Liposuction, and Coming Out Fatter. Time to Convict Democrats of Economic Malpractice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Exactly, not a 100 IQ dem voter to be seen anywhere.


111 posted on 09/12/2010 7:29:43 AM PDT by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Also from '08....

4 Fannie Mae senior execs resign (Beth Wilkinson - married to David Gregory)

112 posted on 09/12/2010 7:30:56 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

My guess,and its not as good as yours, you are on the scene,is that she will win and it will be close.


113 posted on 09/12/2010 7:32:39 AM PDT by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
Do we prefer Boehner to this? Is that the question Axelrod?

Excellent graph....why can't these interviewers use charts. They are much more self-explanatory.

Woah, Gregory plays the CNN video of the imam Rauf saying if we don't build the mosque, it will be a bigger problem in the Muslim world. Guiliani talks about the "good" imam and the "bad" imam. Worried about the underlying threat that this imam is issuing with these statements. The imam seems to be more of a confronter vs. a healer.
114 posted on 09/12/2010 7:32:43 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

11.”We turned the economy around”

And all the folks that once believe that are now going to be hoarding their resources too, wishing they had listened to FreeRepublic.com’s many warning signs...easily predictable.


115 posted on 09/12/2010 7:33:09 AM PDT by Son House (Like Getting Liposuction, and Coming Out Fatter. Time to Convict Democrats of Economic Malpractice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Add in he looks like an old vampire and you are there!!!
116 posted on 09/12/2010 7:34:01 AM PDT by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Rod, thanks for listening to Axelrod and posting his talking points. Great observations and comments by you, as always!

Some of these were the same things that Obama said in his presser on Friday.

Re the Boehnor comment (on F&F earlier, Rove said he questioned why they were attacking Boehnor, since most people didn’t have a clue who he is):

Community of Notions: Why Obama is attacking a congressman hardly anyone has heard of.
Wall Street Journal ^ | September 10, 2010 | JAMES TARANTO

Posted on Sunday, September 12, 2010 6:14:33 AM by Inappropriate Laughter

Rule No. 13 in Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” is “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Community organizer in chief Barack Obama has been trying to do just that. His target is John Boehner.

Who is John Boehner? You probably know the answer if you read this column, but that puts you in a minority.

SNIP

That means at least 55% of the public doesn’t know or care enough about Boehner to have an opinion—and we’d bet that some portion of the 23% answers “unfavorable” by default when asked their view of any politician.

Boehner is an odd choice of target for Obama for other reasons. Unlike the Senate, the House runs almost entirely on majority rule, which means the minority leader is powerless to obstruct legislation. Since much of the legislation Obama has pushed for is wildly unpopular, the claim that Boehner is an obstructionist is, to most voters, an argument for giving him a majority. And the president of the United States is the most powerful man in the world. He only diminishes himself by engaging in personal attacks against any other politician, perhaps excepting a serious challenger in a re-election campaign.

So why is Obama doing it? A clue can be found in Alinsky’s Rule No. 6: “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

There’s no question that Obama’s people are having fun:

SNIP

Obama has been losing Middle America, slowly but steadily, almost since the day he took office, in large part because he has taken his cues from a community of notions whose attitude toward Middle America ranges from indulgent condescension to outright hostility.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2587667/posts


117 posted on 09/12/2010 7:34:52 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Thanks for the link....did not know that.


118 posted on 09/12/2010 7:34:56 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Actually if we control both houses the dems will try and shut down govt. and then blame it on us.


119 posted on 09/12/2010 7:35:42 AM PDT by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Tax Cuts = Deficits. There's another little problem rolling around in all of this Obama gift to business proposal. I keep hearing that allowing business to expense capital purchases in 2011 is a tax break/reduction. Well, it's not a reduction; it's a deferral.

If my business spends $1,000,000 on fixed assets, eventually the business gets to deduct the entire $1,000,000 against taxable income. Normally, that happens over several years. If the Obamanation allows me to expense that entire $1,000,000 in 2011, then my business has no depreciation in 2012, 2013, etc. So my tax bill goes up that year, but over the useful life of the asset the total deduction is $1,000,000.

And if the corporate tax rate is 35% in 2011, and it looks like that tax rate will be 45% in 2012 and forward, now I have a more complicated decision to make, just because the tax policy has affected my decision to buy or not to buy.

And that leads to the last point. If I don't expect my business to increase in 2011, do I buy fixed assets now just to defer income tax, betting that the customers will suddenly show up, or do I wait for customers to show up first?

Bottom line; sounds like a tax policy put together by community organizers and political lawyers.

120 posted on 09/12/2010 7:36:00 AM PDT by Bernard (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, Three if by Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-359 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson