To: newbie2008
Was it too hard to provide a government controlled kill switch?
Just askin’...
2 posted on
09/02/2010 9:41:17 AM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 586 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: newbie2008
Could the undocumented Emperor not control it?
3 posted on
09/02/2010 9:52:30 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: newbie2008
They didn't pay off the right politicians.
5 posted on
09/02/2010 9:58:21 AM PDT by
Myrddin
To: newbie2008
Welp, normally the FCC represents all that I find wrong, but the company did want the spectrum for free, which honestly does seem to be a tad unfair.
To: newbie2008
Free wireless broadband without some kind of porn filters? No thanks. Giving pornographers even more unfettered access to our children is a horrible idea.
To: newbie2008
Early on, the plan ran afoul of puritanical concerns about how it could be used for viewing pornography--but the FCC's intention to filter porn ran into opposition with civil liberties groups. There they go again. Cherchez l'ACLU.
9 posted on
09/02/2010 10:22:45 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(Government does nothing as economically as the private sector. - Ronald Reagan)
To: newbie2008
they weren’t planning to use union labor apparently
To: newbie2008
“Early on, the plan ran afoul of puritanical concerns about how it could be used for viewing pornography...”
Like... every other internet connection on the planet?
To: newbie2008
So let me understand, our employees at the FCC have kept secret from us why a good thing for us is bad?
Pink slips for all, and let's see what the next crop of FCC employees can do for us.
12 posted on
09/02/2010 11:17:04 AM PDT by
yesca
("..don't touch that)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson