I watched the debate. To me this is a good example of why to not nominate a RINO to take on a socialist big government Democrat. A true Constitutional Conservative would have wiped out Boxer and all the Crat Hacks on the panel and the moderator.
Hey Fiorina did very well and cogent too. Ending remarks showed Carly had a good message and Babs rambled about and not very convincing!
Unfortunately I came in too far toward the end of the debate...but Fiorina is a far better pick than Boxer... She kept saying “take back our country”...she gets it!
Exactly my feelings. Oh well, Fiorina is better than Boxer, even if she isn’t very inspiring. It’s just that Boxer is just that bad.
The problem is, a true conservative won’t get elected in California.
The true conservatives lost the state incrementally, and they will regain it in the same manner.
Fiorina will open the door a crack - then the real conservatives will break it down.
First things first - get Boxer out of office.
100% agree, but she still could have done better, even as a RINO. Here are a few answers she should have given:
“Man-made global warming is a political extortion scheme. Next question.”
“Barbara Boxer is a career politican. However many checks I signed at HP is that many more than she’s ever signed.”
“Why is Barbara Boxer so enamored with exterminating children in utero? I thought we were here to talk about jobs.”
You do understand that a pure conservative could never be elected in California?
Who was the last California Senator to fit your description of “A true Constitutional Conservative”?