Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SaxxonWoods

The issue is Property Rights.


42 posted on 08/31/2010 5:59:34 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: trumandogz

If the issue was property rights, he would have called the Mosque opponent thieves and robbers.

Instead he called them bigots. Which means at least for him, it isn’t about supporting property rights, it’s about fighting anti-islamic sentiments.


46 posted on 08/31/2010 6:05:39 PM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: trumandogz

I have not heard anyone argue that the owners of the property have no right to build a mosque, assuming such a use is approved through normal channels by the local planning and zoning commission.

I certainly wouldn’t dispute that right. The issue is that Muslims should be more sensitive to what happened in the area and how it has affected the families and friends of the victims, the responders and many Americans.

The Inman says he wants to reach out to Americans. Slapping us in the face with a victory mosque is not the way to reach out. We have nothing to prove to Islam, muslims live and worship without harrassment every day in this country.

Islam is the entity with something to prove. Muslims need to show us that AQ, the Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah and the other groups that sow terror are not following the precepts of Islam, are shunned and thrown out of Islam.


49 posted on 08/31/2010 6:12:42 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Gone Galt and loving it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson