Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Allegra
According to this criteria, I am a bigot. And mighty proud to say so.

If you propose to se the coercive force of government to selectively stop a property owner from building a mosque on his own land, you are also an anti-property rights bigot. "Mighty proud" of that too?

19 posted on 08/29/2010 8:59:00 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Captain Kirk
"Mighty proud" of disagreeing with just about every issue a leftist Paulbot like yourself promotes, yes.

Why don't you go kiss Michael Bloomberg's ass while you're at it, Trekkie?

20 posted on 08/29/2010 9:06:09 AM PDT by Allegra (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Captain Kirk

You might want to check out eminant domain issues to see how much individual property rights matter these days. I’m just about sick of hearing about their property rights to build and how we should just bow to this because this is such a basic right to Americans. But how quickly can our property rights be snatched from us when a community feels a parking lot serves the greater good than someone’s home or business.

Eminent domain considers the greater good of the community over the property rights of the individual. So I say that this is the same issue... the community’s greater good should in fact be the standard here. It’s not anti-American at all. This issue is far more important than a parking lot.

I hear a lot of talk about how our opposition is against our Constitution. But I say that our Constitution upholds our right to say a loud and resounding NO. Remeber it’s We the people...


21 posted on 08/29/2010 9:18:34 AM PDT by myrabach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Captain Kirk
Well, in as much as Islam is a totalitarian political ideology masquerading as a religion, I will go further than that. I would strip Islam of all 1st Amendment protections such as local property tax exemptions.

And because Sharia Law is a threat to our Constitutional guarantees of republican form of government and equal rights for all citizens regardless of sex I would suppress the practice of Islam in this country unless they all took a loyalty oath. If you knew anything about the history of Islam you would understand that a person cannot at the same time be a sincere believer in Islam and a loyal American. That is not bigotry but factual

30 posted on 08/29/2010 9:52:21 AM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Captain Kirk
Well, in as much as Islam is a totalitarian political ideology masquerading as a religion, I will go further than that. I would strip Islam of all 1st Amendment protections such as local property tax exemptions.

And because Sharia Law is a threat to our Constitutional guarantees of republican form of government and equal rights for all citizens regardless of sex I would suppress the practice of Islam in this country unless they all took a loyalty oath. If you knew anything about the history of Islam you would understand that a person cannot at the same time be a sincere believer in Islam and a loyal American. That is not bigotry but factual

31 posted on 08/29/2010 9:52:28 AM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Captain Kirk
As some wise person said, "the Constitution is not a suicide pact". Unless I missed the gist of this article, the entire point was that British Muslims used British freedoms against the British people to enact such things as sharia courts in a heretofore western civilised nation. Sometimes two principles clash against each other, and this is one of those times. That's when common sense-not to mention learning from history-comes in to play. Radical Muslims have become adept at misusing the very freedoms which they want to destroy in their dream of a worldwide caliphate, against freedom-loving peoples. We don't have to offer our necks to them by adhering to the letter of the law while allowing them to breach the spirit of it.
32 posted on 08/29/2010 10:03:10 AM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Captain Kirk
If you propose to se the coercive force of government to selectively stop a property owner from building a mosque on his own land

you are also an anti-property rights bigot. "Mighty proud" of that too?
43 posted on 08/29/2010 11:23:30 AM PDT by Allegra (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Captain Kirk

You Muslim-loving traitor filth are the worst of the worst. Worse than child molesters, worse than serial rapists, worse than Hitler. You say you support “property rights”? Ha! Where were you when small farmers had their land stolen by the EPA because a pond on their farm was labeled a “wetland”? Where will you be when a strip club, synagogue, BBQ joint, or anything else that’s offensive to Muslims buys land next to the mosque and wants to open up their business with THEIR property rights? Huh? That’s right, you’re nowhere around. You are a vile, subhuman hypocrite and a rotten, filthy cockroach of a liar.

You’re worse than Hitler because Hitler oppressed everyone, good and bad. He killed good Jews and evil Communists. You, on the other hand, think only evil people should have rights and good people should have none. That’s proof that you’re worse than Hitler.

Go catch AIDS and die, you subhuman neo-Nazi Jew-hating Muslim-loving America-hating Ron Paul-dick sucking maggot.


56 posted on 09/06/2010 5:28:00 PM PDT by JillValentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson