Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/25/2010 7:56:00 PM PDT by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: smokingfrog

2 posted on 08/25/2010 7:58:17 PM PDT by smokingfrog (freerepublic.com - Thanks JimRob! The flags are back! - 8/17/2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama; 10Ring

Just another example of how globalization and free trade (as envisioned by FDR) are placing our troops in danger.


3 posted on 08/25/2010 7:59:00 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
If it gets the job, then fine by me.


4 posted on 08/25/2010 8:03:55 PM PDT by 50cal Smokepole (Effective gun control involves effective recoil management)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

The SCAR is a pretty nifty weapons system, to be sure.

I do get a bit of the sense that the writer doesn’t completely understand what kind of rifles these Taliban “sharpshooters” are probably using, or that there are other 7.62 mm rifles in the U.S. and NATO inventory that can “reach out and touch someone” at those ranges, even if they aren’t modular or as modern as the SCAR.

It could be I’m influenced by other articles on this topic - I read one a while back where the writer confused 7.62x39 with 7.62x54 and basically argued that the AK-47 had the same effective range of a PKM.

Either way, though, the SCAR is pretty nifty. :-)


8 posted on 08/25/2010 8:11:34 PM PDT by DemforBush (You might think that, *I* could not possibly comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
But there is a variant of the M4 that Chambers the 7.62 NATO. I saw it while browsing on line for info. BTW, a friend is having trouble with his S&W model 59 9mm, does anyone know where to get solid schematics/pictures and detailed disassembly/reassembly instructions? Most of whats out there is scetchy at best.
10 posted on 08/25/2010 8:13:30 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Whatever-it-takes BUMP for America’s finest!


11 posted on 08/25/2010 8:13:43 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

About fiiing time. Essentially a more compact FAL FN. Our troops FINALLY have some stopping power.

I want one of these but....
http://www.dsarms.com/SA58-FAL-Standard-Rifle-308-Cal——SA58STD/productinfo/SA58STD/

...probably will only spend for one of these.
http://www.dsarms.com/STG58—Austrian-FAL-Standard-Rifle-308-Cal-——STG58STD/productinfo/STG58STD/

Sadly the mission has been compromised because The Imam is a muslim and ALL of TV including Fox/Saudia supports The Imam, Islam and The Victory Mosque.

The idiots who pay for cable and sat TV are already paying a jizya or Islmic tax on non-muslims.


13 posted on 08/25/2010 8:14:52 PM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

I like the SCAR-H in Call of Duty, Modern Warfare 2. :-)


17 posted on 08/25/2010 8:19:35 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (obama out now! I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom - you can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

I wonder if DSA’s version of the mini FAL at $1975 would have been cheaper and just as good.

http://www.dsarms.com/Mini-SA58-FAL-OSW-Rifle-Semi-Auto-308-Cal——SA58OSW/productinfo/SA58OSW/

One FR’er said Spec Ops was buying up all of DSA’s capacity post 9/11.


20 posted on 08/25/2010 8:25:43 PM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

So we are back to a variant (seems inferior in bbl length) of the M14/M1A? This is not new. It is like getting rid of 0bamacare!!!


30 posted on 08/25/2010 8:59:55 PM PDT by MtnClimber (Osama and Obama both hate freedom and have friends that bombed the Pentagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Can I play?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

33 posted on 08/25/2010 9:19:03 PM PDT by Cyber Ninja (Live and Let Live; is not working...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
Interesting article. Except for the fact that the caliber du jour is now the .338 LaPua mag.

Its the current heart-breaker and life taker in the Afghan battle box.
39 posted on 08/25/2010 11:13:01 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Our troops call the M-16 the “poodle shooter” for a reason.


41 posted on 08/26/2010 1:01:00 AM PDT by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

I’m either reading articles from people whom never served or are just tired of the M-4. I served as a Ranger in 3/75, 1/75tth HHC, 75th Regiment STB, and finally decided I did my time and went into the 18 pipeline. The FN SCAR is a great weapon platform and first deployed with Army Rangers. The SCAR is a 5.56, and 7.62. The MK 20 is bad ass in shooting out to 1,500 yards. (MK20 is sniper variant of SCAR). Getting rid of the 5.56 would be retarded considering how combat in Iraq was mostly Close quarters, and we used Snipers on Tall buildings. The AK isn’t as lethal as a M-4. Being shot in close quarters by a AK round in Iraq killed only 10% of U.S. Troops hit. A raghead hit at the very same range with an M-4 wouldn’t survive due to the round ripping through there body. The effective range of a M-4 beats that of a AK 47 unless the AK-74”is being used where it was extremely rare to see. However in Afghanistan the AK platform worked mostly due to the use of the RPK and not AK 47. The 7.62 wounds I saw where through and through at close ranges. That is why the U.S. M-24 SWS was used as a sniper weapon and not the main battle rifle. We also used the H&K 416, and 417. They were great considering they didn’t have to be cleaned daily where the M-4 did. We used Heavy machine guns a lot more in A Stan as opposed to M-4. Yes we did field it and I was glad to be in a sniper role as opposed to regular infantryman.


42 posted on 06/24/2015 6:27:38 PM PDT by Glennw79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson