“If anyone better than JD had been running, McCain would not have won.”
There’s no one better than JD in Arizona or a lot of other states.
There’s no one better than JD in Arizona or a lot of other states.Obviously, not.
In the POLTICAL area, being "better" means being "able to get more votes than the other guy."
I'm also tired of all those "marvelous conservatives" out there...
...Governor Tom McClintock, Senator Chuck DeVore, President Duncan Hunter -- and now, Senator Hayworth......not being able to master the art of RETAIL politics.
LOL
Hmmmmm I disagree. The reason McCain shellacked JD because it was JD- I still think today McCain was the choice that would keep that seat Republican regardless of me not liking him
Dale, you’re wasting your breath. This person like a lot of others here haven’t a clue what Conservatism is, or what solid candidates are.
Isn’t it interesting that the same folks who fight off valid issues regarding Palin, none the less think that a guy with a 97.6% favorable rating from the American Conservative Union is a bad risk for public office.
Yep, a guy with a 65% rating, beat Hayworth because he was a terrible candidate for the office.
Which candidate...
Consorts with Soros
Consorted with Kennedy
Consorted with Kerry
Consorted with Feingold
Consorted with Lieberman
Consorted with Terressa Heinz Kerry & the Tides Foundation
and this...
http://www.hotr.us/mccain/mccainagain.html
Well, we’ve got McCain again. Rather prophetic, no?
Just remember, it was that weak candidate Hayworth that was the problem. McCain was the only real choice...
Good God...
A low profile candidate with eloquence and intellect is better than a high profile buffoon. I refuse to believe that there aren’t any qualified people in certain states. I think it’s more of a question of money for running a campaign and commitment.