Posted on 08/24/2010 6:28:46 AM PDT by TSgt
Oh' wait! Reverend Davis means FREE housing!
The sense of entitlement is appalling especially after their Katrina FEMA handout.
Let them live in a tent city, I'm tired of paying for the parasites.
Haiti on the Big Muddy.
what happens when the people rely upon government to solve their problems...
Sounds like fantastic news for New Orleans. Fewer leeches is good for everyone all around.
Stay in school, learn some skills, stay out of gangs, don’t do drugs, marry the woman before you get her pregnant and then you will be able to find “affordable housing.”
Then buy yourself a piece of land and build all the houses you want to build!!!!!
Katrina was a failure of the governed as much as it was a failure of the government...
“Sounds like fantastic news for New Orleans. Fewer leeches is good for everyone all around.”
Bad news for other Southern cities where the leeches from NO are now permanently attatched to our tax dollars and birthing ever increasing litters.
Terrible news for Houston.
Housing you can't afford and no job.... Productive members of society would not consider moving to such a location.
Actually, the “leeches” didn’t all stay in N’awlins’-—Because of them, the crime rate has gone way up in cities like Houston and Austin.
I don't know if it would work, but I propose fire-bombing New Orleans.
Not for us in Houston. Many leeches came here and stayed. We STILL have people living in FEMA trailers. Talk about ridiculous !
New Orleans can have 'em back as far as I'm concerned. But I sure can't see why WE pay for it.
This sums up Katrina. I am so sick of hearing about Katrina I could, well never mind
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XivNwQ76mCs
“Katrina was a failure of the governed as much as it was a failure of the government...”
####
Indeed, but I would say that it was actually MUCH more of the former than the latter.
We should have never rebuilt the City of New Orleans. The Port of New Orleans is an absolute necessity. The City of New Orleans is an absurdity and needs to go.
It's the same old story. Voters are presented with a quite reasonable proposal to have government take over some troubled aspect of life. The proposal is couched in the most inoffensive and non-intrusive terms. But the ballot wording of the initiative only barely resembles what the voters were told in an effort to garner support for it.
Those who speak out against the proposal are painted by the supporters as cruel, insensitive people who have no compassion for the less fortunate.
The initiative passes and the saga begins. All sorts of things were included that no one realized were there, or the bureaucrats responsible for the program just do what they want, knowing full well it's not in what the citizens consented to, but also knowing they probably won't figure it out. And even if they do, what are they going to do about it. By the time anyone realizes they're being robbed blind so many of the less fortunate are wholly dependent on the government largess that it's impossible to cut the benefits.
I could go on and on with the roots that spread from the initial proposal to what it becomes in 10 years or so.
At some point it becomes “too big to end.”
Couldn't happen to a better pair of liberal h***holes.
>Stay in school, learn some skills, stay out of gangs, dont do drugs, marry the woman before you get her pregnant and then you will be able to find affordable housing.<
Man, that is such a boring, deadbeat life! Who would want to live like that. Not us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.