Ann Coulter on WND: 'They're a bunch of fake Christians'

WND ^ | August 22, 2010 | WND

[RobinMasters]

WASHINGTON – Conservative pundit Ann Coulter intensified her attacks on WND last night on Fox News Channel's "Red Eye" show, accusing those at the largest independent news site who dropped her from the "Taking America Back National Conference" in Miami of being "fake Christians."

Coulter claimed she was never actually booked for the event, repeated her resentment over publishing her e-mail explanations to WND Editor Joseph Farah for appearing at GOProud's Homocon event and lashed out at WND for "pushing the birther thing," which she said is not supported by any conservatives.

"These are fake Christians trying to get publicity," said Coulter.

Previously, Coulter called Farah a "publicity whore" and a "swine" for WND's decision to drop her upon learning of her plan to speak to the homosexual Republican group.

In response, Farah issued the following statement: "Coulter called me a 'publicity whore' for my decision. But look who is on television talking about this – throwing mud, name-calling, smearing not only me but my entire staff. I will not engage in the kind of ad hominem attacks that have made Coulter so famous and that are making her even more of a media darling in this age of reckless anger and character assassination for the sake of entertainment. Every day, since we made this decision at WND, I thank God for giving me the clarity of mind and discernment to make the right choice."

[Tex-Con-Man]

He was making public that he was excluding her and why.
I think she should say she disagreed with him.
The problem was the catty stuff.

So you don't have a problem with him releasing their private email? (Try doing that on FR and see how the Mods react.)

[gidget7]

There is a HUGE difference between voting and lobbying! Of course people can vote any way they wish. This is a lobbying group with an expressed agenda, that is well spelled out on their website. No organization holding a convention named “HomoCon” is there to be talked to about the error of their ways. The group exists solely to push gay special rights. THAT is a problem.

[fr_freak]

"She is going to celebrate with them and endorse their organization."

On what authority do you say that?

What do they celebrate, homosexuality? And is Coulter going to be there saying "Yea homos! Yea sodomy!"??

And how do you know she is going to endorse their organization?

I don't think you understand the concept of implied endorsement. It is a homosexual-themed convention. She will be attending, and there is little to no chance that she will say anything condemning that theme. In fact, I don't expect her to do or say anything much beyond her usual stuff, but her attendance is enough to imply an endorsement. If it were merely a conservative convention which had some gay people there, this would be a non-issue. However, it is a convention of homosexuals who claim to be conservative, and Ann's attendance necessarily embraces that theme.

[neocon1984]

I sent information I had discovered about him to Ann. She ignored all of it.

Oooh! She ignored you. I will volunteer to be her bodyguard. In the meantime, better get that medication eval.

[hinckley buzzard]

Fortunately no one pays much attention to either one these days. But Ann Coulter a fag hag? Hard to believe.

[MrEdd]

I'll tell what I know she won't say, and that is "Turn from your sinful ways. Reject homosexuality." She won't say that, will she?

Considering that doing things just like you desribed is how she got where she is, and why she is so popular among many conservatives - No I don't know that she won't say that.

What is your source for your assertion that she is suddenly changing her behavior and views? Other than Farrah?

[driftdiver]

Nice personal attack there. I’m done with you folks frothing at the mouth about this issue.

Keep doing what you’ve been doing, its worked so well.

[fr_freak]

Considering that doing things just like you desribed is how she got where she is, and why she is so popular among many conservatives - No I don't know that she won't say that.

Really? You actually think there's a chance that Ann Coulter accepted an invitation to a homosexual convention so that she can condemn homosexuality? I think a small wager may be in order.

Look, I like Ann, for the most part, but, as always, it is a mistake to put so much faith in a human being that you refuse to believe what you see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears. Nobody is perfect, and that includes Ann. She is wrong here.

[fr_freak]

Nice personal attack there. I’m done with you folks frothing at the mouth about this issue.

Keep doing what you’ve been doing, its worked so well.

What personal attack? The atheist Left comment? I clearly stated that I was not applying that to you, specifically to avoid offense. Don't be so sensitive.

[gidget7]

Oh indeed it can. Farah is standing on principle, and I wish more fplks, especially in government, did the same.

[adamjefferson]

I am seriously ticked at farah. Dropping her by press report on his wnd site was a slap in the face of one of the stars of the conservative movement. If he wants to hate her because she doesn’t hate gays is ridiculous. What a jackass move on his part.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

Ann Coulter a fag hag? Hard to believe.

She sure spends a lot of time on FNC 'red eye' lately. That show looks like the Log Cabin Posse hijacked the FNC.. Half naked 'cowboys" and such... NO thanks..

[arthurus]

Is Ann working on being the new Ariana?

[Nick Danger]

A scorpion and a snake wake up in a bottle...

[aSeattleConservative]

No it is not. Christians do not have to be hateful to any group of people. I guess none of you know gay people.

I didn't know that one's friendship of sinners superseded (and in this case nullified) the laws of God.

Brother or uncle?

[DirtyHarryY2K]

Here she is hanging out with the fags and lamont hill the leftist obama bot on the ‘red eye’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGkvhijoS-Q

[aSeattleConservative]

"Ann Coulter a fag hag? Hard to believe."

She sure spends a lot of time on FNC 'red eye' lately. That show looks like the Log Cabin Posse hijacked the FNC.. Half naked 'cowboys" and such... NO thanks..

I was hoping someone would address Red Eye. I quit watching it when Gutfield and his "panel" started mocking someone that stood up against homosexuality.

What's with his sidekick Bill anyway? Is he a sodomite or what? (the lisp kinda gives him away).

[DirtyHarryY2K]

I believe they’re all sodomites. Even the guests.

[506Lake]

Right before November elections... There are other more critical issues to take the Dem’s down, as in, the economy. Stay on message GOP.

Both of these publicity whores should STFU.

[aSeattleConservative]

Here she is hanging out with the fags and lamont hill the leftist obama bot on the ‘red eye’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGkvhijoS-Q

Peter LaBarbera at Americans for Truth About Homosexuality wrote an article on Hill and Red Eye.
Link to AFTAH article