ping
ping
ping
Guess it is about the money for lots of stars who tout conservatism.
Ya think?
Ann’s reply to the wimp Farah:
In an email to the Daily Caller, Coulter ripped into WND editor Joseph Farah, calling him a “publicity whore” and blasting him for releasing private emails that she’d sent him. “He’s a swine for using my private emails politely answering him. why would he do such a despicable thing? ... for PUBLICITY,” she wrote. She also said that Farah “could give two sh-ts about the the conservative movement — as demonstrated by his promotion of the birther nonsense.”
The government is devouring our liberties, draining our nation’s wealth, preventing prosperity and holding political correctness in higher priority than our security...but that’s NOTHING compared to what’s going on between consenting adults in their bedrooms! It would be a crime for us conservatives to accept support from those who don’t agree with each and every one of our pet social causes.
I won’t insult your intelligence with a sarcasm tag.
Well, I am curious what Ann would say. Would it be a “we agree to disagree” kind of speech? What WND drops or picks up is of very little concern to me. If someone of the stature of the Family Research Council blacklisted Ann it would be of more import, but I believe they would wait to see what Ann actually said to GOProud at Homocon.
Of course after seeing a looker like Ann, some of the Homoconners might not be so Confident that they really are homos....
Glad to see more conservatives dropping the anti-gay thing. It’s a pointless non-issue and there are way bigger fish to fry.
When Ann went through the wringer at a Canadian University and had to cancel her address about a year ago, no one was more contemptuous than myself of the little squits of students. There was a lot of fun with a picture of an activist female with a mouth as wide as a barn door, screaming blue murder, this on FR.
I sure like Joe. Bill Cunningham was brave enough to have Joe on his Sunday night radio show which starts at 10pm Eastern. Joe got right into it and began to show plainly the problem of an incredible lack of background regarding the President. It was not just the lack of a long form birth certificate that he spoke on.
Ann says just because she addresses a group, does not mean she supports them. She has her reasons I suppose. Myself, seeing the absolute determination of some homosexuals to bore into the soul of society, I still wince.
One does not have to be obtuse or plain nasty to the homosexual, of course not. Only support them living their OWN lives, and be wary for one's own cultural well being.
Perhaps a master diplomat will come forward and mend fences here. Conservatives cannot and must not destroy each other, at this stage of a struggle for the very soul of America.
Sort of like the regents at the Canadian University who knew what she was going to say, before she said it?
WND is correct on this one....and surprised Farah has not dropped her yet for the attacks on Birthers. I guess you can add “Obama Supporter” to Ann’s new resume.
Ann is now on the other side. She is welcome any time.
I get a laugh out of the perverted homosexuals when they chant people must accept their perversion. The recent prison escape in AZ involved two people that were lovers. Also they were cousins. The homos are having a ball playing this up. Yet the perverted homos overlook the fact that these two are consenting adults, and doing it behind closed doors. Does that chant sound familiar? It should it is the shame chant the perverted homosexuals have used for decades to defend their perverted lifestyle choice.