Stalking horse question, for what reason is anyone’s guess. The only form of Freemasonry which restricts religious background is in Scandanavia, and is the Swedish Rite, which accepts only Christians. Of course he could be a Freemason and a Muslim.... but just imagine if they restrict queers or bisexuals... or just plain marxists which supposedly Muslims reject. Because none of these are compatible with Freemasonry in any one Lodge, there being no central organization that dictates membership it is unlikely obamao is a Mason. Voting someone like Obambi into a Lodge would be a progress-limiting accomplishment, most probably contrary to Masonic beliefs. If however, we could somehow obtain real background, he would have to have proven he was a freeborn man, a natural born man of his country- a noted Constitutional requirement for the Presidency of the U.S. Islamics and their pals do not like Freemasonry because they think it sides with Semites and Zionists. Saddam Hussein decreed the death penalty for those who “promote or acclaim Zionist principles, including freemasonry, or who associate with Zionist organisations.” This anti-Masonic bent has been expressed by the Roman Catholic church since 1738. Since the original guild masons built the finest cathedrals in all of Europe this makes this perhaps a reflection of the disdain by the royalty of the lowly laborer class building churches for the ruling class. But for some real accuracy you should consult “National Treasure” movie for some cultish co-labeling stereotypes. Bilderberger’s anyone?
It’s not whether the Freemaons would take him..it’s whether the Muslims would allow it. There are Muslims who are Freemasons. I have seen posts of people asking if it is okay to be both (who are already Masons and Muslim) and seen answers that state..no it is not okay to be Muslim and a Freemason.
As for not voting Obama in..they voted in Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Mfume, Fattah, and Rangel..so I don’t see much difference in voting in Obama.