Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brytani
Exactly what rights and responsibilities does an Commissioned Officer in the US Military have afforded to them, under the UCMJ or any other legally binding document, if they believe an unlawful order has been given to them directly by a superior officer?


Lakin used Article 138 of the UCMJ to make a complaint for redress noted in his Timeline below, which includes orders that are beyond the legitimate authority (Obama "BHO" the usurper) of a commander or commanders.



Lakin Timeline

167 posted on 08/11/2010 5:31:37 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

Thank you. I just read through UCMJ Article 138 and 139 plus related information - unless I’m missing something, our military members are screwed.

If they attempt to clarify the issue of Obama’s eligibility to assure themselves that their orders are indeed lawful, and are denied clarification (as Lakin was for over a year) they have three options. They either follow orders they believe to be unlawful, resign their commission or refuse and await a court martial.

Major General Paul Vallely is correct; our military should not be forced to ask these questions.


176 posted on 08/11/2010 6:40:52 PM PDT by Brytani (There Is No (D) in November! Go Allen!!! www.allenwestforcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

Wow. I hadn’t absorbed the process that took place with Congress. What did the Office of Military Legislative Affairs do with that complaint?

Considering that Driscoll claims that only Congress can deal with this, they were way wrong to court-martial Lakin before the Office of Military Legislative Affairs had dealt with the issue. Or was that office refusing to deal with the issue so Lakin upped the ante by refusing to deploy?

I should go read all that again, now that I have a better understanding of the issues and processes.


247 posted on 08/12/2010 6:39:39 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

Wamp’s complaint to the Office of Military Legislative Affairs is the nail in Fukino’s coffin.

The statements Fukino were facially correct, but they concealed the rest of the story.

The Federal General False Statement Act forbids false statements, concealment, and false documentation in any matter within the jurisdiction of the 3 branches of government. But there is a limitation regarding concealment. Concealment isn’t a crime in a court case (unless the person has the duty to not conceal) and it isn’t a crime regarding the legislative branch - EXCEPT when involving administrative issues or

“any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the
authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate. 18 U.S.C. 1001(b),(c).”

Because the issue of Obama’s eligibility and documentation was referred to the Office of Military Legislative Affairs for investigation or review, any CONCEALMENT of facts regarding that is a federal crime. That means Fukino is dead meat and so is anybody who has reported on this issue but deliberately conceals some of the facts.

I have reported the fact that the HDOH confirmed the Factcheck COLB as a forgery to darn near every media outlet I could think of. I was just in a scuffle with The Hutch News because the editor refused to correct his statement that the HI SOS had come forward with Obama’s BC.

Because of that referral that Rep Wamp’s office made, that is a violation of the Federal General False Statement Act.

Come to think of it, somebody in Congress requested an FBI investigation into this issue also so concealment of the facts would also come under the jurisdiction of federal law enforcment, the executive branch.

No way out of it. The people who have concealed the facts on Obama’s documentation - including Fukino and Okubo, Gibbs, Pelosi, Factcheck, and just about everybody in the media - is guilty of breaking 18 U.S.C 1001.


282 posted on 08/12/2010 10:20:45 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson