Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Insubordinate army doctor asks for court martial: Obama is not president
sf gate ^

Posted on 08/11/2010 11:00:30 AM PDT by traumer

An insubordinate Army doctor has been charged with disobeying orders after failing to show up for duty in Afghanistan and questioning whether President Barack Obama has the right to order him there. Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, birther and insubordinate soldier headed for court martial

Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, birther and insubordinate soldier headed for court martial

Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin is scheduled to be arraigned Friday at Fort Belvoir, VA and in all likelihood will either be sentenced to detention and/or given a dishonorable discharge from the military.

Lakin will be charged under Article 92 and 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice which states - Under Article 92, Any person subject to this chapter who:

(1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation;

(2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or...

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

Under Article 86, UCMJ. Any member of the armed forces who, without authority -

(1) fails to go to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed;

(2) goes from that place; or

(3) absents himself or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty at which he is required to be at the time prescribed;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

I hope Lakin gets both jail time and a dishonorable discharge. From the video he posted on YouTube, it looks like he will have a short court martial as it seems he will just plead guilty. Hopefully he will expeditiously sentenced to jail time and a dishonorable discharge.

Lakin is from Greeley, Colorado and was ordered to go to Afghanistan. He did not report to Fort Campbell, KY

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; birthcertificate; certifigate; lakin; ltclakin; military; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-403 next last
To: Mr Rogers

Of course not. The president doesn’t pay the military.


61 posted on 08/11/2010 12:14:38 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Every order given by Obama is. However, his orders has to be challenged and not many are going to do that in this political climate but for the very few.

Again, Lakin is not charged with disobeying Obama's orders but the orders of Colonel Roberts, Colonel McHugh, and Lieutenant Colonel Judd.

62 posted on 08/11/2010 12:15:15 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
So every order given by every officer in every branch of service since January 20, 2009 has been illegal? Including any orders given by Lakin himself?

I'll qualify my last statement to you. Obama's orders do not have the backing of the US Constitution where only being constitutionally qualified presidential office holders derive their legitimacy and authority.

63 posted on 08/11/2010 12:15:28 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: edge919

“all Lakin has to do is cite the Supreme Court’s definition of natural born to prove that Obama is not Constitutionally qualified”

Umm...what definition is that? The one where they equate native born with natural born? The one where they say the meaning of natural born citizen is found in the English common law phrase ‘natural born subject’?


64 posted on 08/11/2010 12:15:32 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: edge919

If all authority for orders resides in the President, then any order since 20 Jan 2009 has - by your standard - been illegal and unenforceable.

The orders to pay Lakin are made by officers under the President, correct?


65 posted on 08/11/2010 12:17:33 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Again, Lakin is not charged with disobeying Obama's orders but the orders of Colonel Roberts, Colonel McHugh, and Lieutenant Colonel Judd.

Again, as I've stated a few times in the past. I expect the Army to keep the charges and the issue of Obama out of the court. They do not want to go there for obvious reasons.

66 posted on 08/11/2010 12:17:49 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

It has been shown to you all orders from military commanders are issued on behalf of the CINC. You stated numerous times they are not.

Military orders and regulations must abide by the constitution.

Obama is not qualified to be president based on the citizenship of his father.

Being born within the walls of a church does not make one a Christian.

Seems you are always bias to Obama. Why is that? Why are you protecting him?


67 posted on 08/11/2010 12:17:52 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: spookie

“Officers take an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Art II Sec 1 Clause 5 defines eligibility for president. Obama is not a natural born citizen.
Therefore he is a usurper. “

And “Bush stole the election” so is not the commander, and Congress didn’t declare war so the Iraqi war is illegal.

Who decides these things, Congress, the courts?


68 posted on 08/11/2010 12:22:36 PM PDT by mainsail that ("A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights" - Napoleon Bonaparte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

You are right. The Supreme Court definition of native born does equal that of natural born (born in the country to parents who are citizens) and not the 14th amendment definition of ‘citizen of the United States. Precedent is precedent, which means Obama is not president.


69 posted on 08/11/2010 12:24:42 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Regardless of whether one agrees with Lakin’s method or not, one has to agree that this man has some real balls, something lacking in so many Americans these days. He believes in something and is putting himself at risk to follow through with that belief. Most people, especially on the “conservative” side, can’t be bothered to take 10 minutes out of their day or say two words in defense of their country, but this guy is risking it all. Anyone who can speak with contempt for this guy is not an American conservative.


70 posted on 08/11/2010 12:25:31 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

The Constitutional authority for funding the armies comes from Congress, not the Commander in Chief.


71 posted on 08/11/2010 12:25:38 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Ranger Drew

72 posted on 08/11/2010 12:27:14 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: edge919

Native born in US Supreme Court usage means born in the USA.
And that is also how they use natural born...

Congress provides funding for both pay and deployments. Military officers decide who it goes to and how much. If a deployment order rests in the President, then so does an order to pay someone.


73 posted on 08/11/2010 12:28:04 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
It has been shown to you all orders from military commanders are issued on behalf of the CINC. You stated numerous times they are not.

It's been stated many times. And I've asked many times if that means that every order given by every officer in every branch of service since January 20, 2009 has been illegal. Well, does it?

Seems you are always bias to Obama. Why is that? Why are you protecting him?

I am biased against officers deciding for themselves what orders are legal and what are not. I believed Huet-Vaughan and Watada both deserved court martials for doing so, and I believe Lakin does as well. That makes me pro-military, not pro-Obama.

74 posted on 08/11/2010 12:33:18 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Native born in US Supreme Court usage means born in the USA. And that is also how they use natural born...

... if born to parents who are citizens. You have to use ALL the words, not just the ones you like.

Congress provides funding for both pay and deployments. Military officers decide who it goes to and how much. If a deployment order rests in the President, then so does an order to pay someone.

For a deployment?? And Lakin refused deployment, so I guess you're right, the president hasn't authorized any deployment payments to Lakin yet ... really, your logic is very tortured. I hate to see what it looks like when you try to cross a street.

75 posted on 08/11/2010 12:33:38 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Again, as I've stated a few times in the past. I expect the Army to keep the charges and the issue of Obama out of the court. They do not want to go there for obvious reasons.

I think you're wrong. Unless he decides to plea-bargain something I think Lakin will be court martialed this fall.

76 posted on 08/11/2010 12:35:18 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

You really twist yourself into a pretzel with all your ridiculous arguments.


77 posted on 08/11/2010 12:35:34 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
I'll qualify my last statement to you. Obama's orders do not have the backing of the US Constitution where only being constitutionally qualified presidential office holders derive their legitimacy and authority.

If he is indeed ineligible then that would certainly be true. But what does that have to do with the lawfulness of orders given by Roberts, McHugh, and Judd?

78 posted on 08/11/2010 12:39:33 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: traumer

go to the article and leave comments mine was the 6th. We should be able to make the SF lefties have an aneurysm.


79 posted on 08/11/2010 12:40:38 PM PDT by waynesa98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"I think you're wrong. Unless he decides to plea-bargain something I think Lakin will be court martialed this fall. "

This thing is getting beyond the control of Obama and his bolshevik operatives. LTC Lakin doing hard-labor at Leavenworth cannot possibly be any part of their strategy.

80 posted on 08/11/2010 12:41:38 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-403 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson