Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FrankR; Politicalmom
I must have missed the part where Politicalmom was doing a reality TV show while thinking of running for President.

Romney is obama-lite, Huckleberry is a televangelist, and Newt ain't got a chance...and Jerry Springer ain't running.

Yes, yes. None of us like any of them either. What does that have to do with whether Palin would be a good candidate for President? Do you have some reason to believe that those are going to be her only opponents?
83 posted on 08/09/2010 11:34:33 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: The Pack Knight
I'm not looking for a candidate that Charlie Gibson or Katie Couric approves of, because the one they would approve of would be another sure loser, like John McCain't.

Sarah is a conservative, she has no fear of the "big boys", and she is not afraid of work. We need someone who is sincere about their love of this country and not just using it at a campaign slogan.

I have looked into all of the slings and arrows thrown her way because most of it is the liberal attack dogs, and none of them have convinced me of anything.

How many times does she have to explain resigning from the Governorship...she removed herself as a target of senseless lawsuits and harassment that would have affected her job and her state, and that pissed off her detractors because it to away their target.

Meanwhile, everyone is railing over Romney with his major failure of an obama-lite socialized medicine, or huckleberry who released a convicted felon, or Newt who dumped his sick wife for his secretary and caved in everything he had built to date in the Republican revolution.

There may be more people running that don't come to mind right now, but I'm sure if they were that outstanding, I would have heard of them by now, as I am retired and I'm on FR most everyday and I watch a lot of news.

Sarah was governing Alaska all that time, and doing a fine job of it; I really wish she had NOT joined up with McCain't, as it gave the libs something to slam without hitting their favorite aisle-crosser (McCain't) too hard.

But after she joined him and made that first speech, McCain's numbers soared, and that scared the poop out of the libs...so the "bush-izing" of Sarah Palin began.

The bottom line is, if Sarah wasn't a threat to the left, you'd never hear a word about her...but instead, she can't brush her teeth without making front page news.

So far the only negatives I hear from the right is that she endorsed McCain, and she should control her daughter; of course, I realize there are people who won't like her because her makeup is the wrong shade, or she says "you betcha". That's fine.

They don't have to justify why they don't like her, but I'm asked to justify why I do...it's a snapshot of what the country is coming to...loss of freedom.
106 posted on 08/09/2010 12:18:27 PM PDT by FrankR (It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson