Skip to comments.
Do you agree with the decision made by Judge Vaughn Walker in overturning California's gay marriage
KGUN9 TV, Tucson, AZ ^
| 8-5-2010
| KGUN9 TV, Tucson, AZ
Posted on 08/05/2010 11:31:51 AM PDT by AZ .44 MAG
KGUN 9 POLL: Do you agree with the decision made by Judge Vaughn Walker in overturning California's gay marriage ban? Yes No Undecided
(Excerpt) Read more at kgun9.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; downourthroats; gayagenda; gayjudge; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; inourfaces; lavendermafia; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: Venturer
The Judges decision came from his own homosexual proclivities, as the Judge is a known homosexual.At the very least, he should have recused himself.
21
posted on
08/05/2010 11:45:58 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: AZ .44 MAG
When Bill Ayers had gay sex with males in the Weather Underground, he says it was an act to “smash monogamy”.
22
posted on
08/05/2010 11:46:04 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
To: dynachrome
The horse looks dead and flogged now but many of the libtards may still be sleeping off last night’s “fun” or at the doc’s getting their AIDS cocktail.
23
posted on
08/05/2010 11:47:29 AM PDT
by
AZ .44 MAG
(Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
24
posted on
08/05/2010 11:48:35 AM PDT
by
Keith
(We live in an America of National Socialism...sound familiar? It should...)
To: a fool in paradise
When Bill Ayers had gay sex with males in the Weather Underground, he says it was an act to smash monogamy. Barack Obama is the Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers.
I saw that on FR a while back but can't remember who posted it.
25
posted on
08/05/2010 11:49:50 AM PDT
by
AZ .44 MAG
(Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
No is 93%. I’m guessing not a lot of votes have been cast.
26
posted on
08/05/2010 11:54:33 AM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(If you call a tail a leg, how many legs has a dog?Five?No, calling a tail a leg don't make it a leg.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Why bother with a poll when all those votes didn’t phase anyone either?
27
posted on
08/05/2010 11:55:06 AM PDT
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
KGUN 9 POLL Do you agree with the decision made by Judge Vaughn Walker in overturning California's gay marriage ban?
Yes No Undecided
Thank you for participating in our poll. Here are the results so far:
Yes 6%
No 93%
Undecided 1%
28
posted on
08/05/2010 11:56:37 AM PDT
by
BelegStrongbow
(St. Joseph, patron of fathers, pray for us!)
To: AZ .44 MAG; All
No matter how few agree, I have to stick with the libertarian view that if it does not hurt others, then it is nobodies business. Stable gay relations are a lot less costly to the health care system than wild promiscuous unprotected gay sex.
29
posted on
08/05/2010 11:56:55 AM PDT
by
gleeaikin
(question authority)
To: AZ .44 MAG
CA needs a sore loser law.
The state has I & R for decades now.
Why bother to spend so much money on a ballot/vote and then go to Court if you lose.
What’s up with that!!!!!!
30
posted on
08/05/2010 11:58:19 AM PDT
by
Carley
(For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
To: BenLurkin
And the judge is a corrupt, un-American, sorry excuse for a human being.
31
posted on
08/05/2010 11:58:49 AM PDT
by
mulligan
To: gleeaikin
“if it does not hurt others, then it is nobodies business”
Huh? Do you even understand how changing the thousands year old definition of marriage totally changes our society? Do you understand the tremendous cost of AIDS on our health care system and the high level of suicide among those with same-sex attraction disorder? I don’t think the solution is to legitimize perversion and sanction it with state and federal rights. That is pure insanity.
To: gleeaikin
No matter how few agree, I have to stick with the libertarian view that if it does not hurt others, then it is nobodies business. Stable gay relations are a lot less costly to the health care system than wild promiscuous unprotected gay sex.How does affirming the traditional definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman deprive homosexuals of the ability to have stable relationships?
33
posted on
08/05/2010 12:17:13 PM PDT
by
AZ .44 MAG
(Our government is a joke and its current makeup is the punch line.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
I thought it was kinda queer that he didn’t recuse himself from the case, for having a conflict of interest.
34
posted on
08/05/2010 12:28:31 PM PDT
by
crosshairs
(Celebrate diversity. Own a variety of firearms.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Something squirley going on - voted and results showed:
16 Yes
84 No
0 Undecided
Then it suddenly changed to:
11 Yes
89 No
0 Undecided
Wonder where all the undecided went? Must be another one of those unscientific polls.
35
posted on
08/05/2010 12:37:12 PM PDT
by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
To: AZ .44 MAG
Doesn’t matter what we think. We are no longer in a representative democracy.
To: gleeaikin
“No matter how few agree, I have to stick with the libertarian view that if it does not hurt others, then it is nobodies business.”
A lot of people will agree with that, even a lot of conservatives. The biggest problem I have with the Vaughn Walker ruling is that it is based on such distorted constitutional reasoning. If the 14th Amendment can be used to justify the nullification of the Defense of Marriage Act, then it’s hard for me to see how it can’t be twisted to justify the nullification of almost any law. If you don’t get your way, you just change the rules, that’s the liberal way of doing things.
To: gleeaikin
Yeah, because now that they can get “married”, all of a sudden they’re going to stop having that wild promiscuous, unprotected sex. Please.
38
posted on
08/05/2010 12:53:44 PM PDT
by
beandog
To: gleeaikin
And that is why I could never support libertarians anymore than I do liberals. They are of the same stripe in most cases except when it comes to guns. Then I agree with them. But they are also for abortion on demand, same sex marrage, open borders, legalization of all drugs and many other things that are harmful to America.
I used to consider myself a libertarian until I went to their site and saw what they really were for. I could never call myself a libertarian again.
39
posted on
08/05/2010 12:54:57 PM PDT
by
RickB444
(Beat your sword into plowshares, but wined up plowing the fields of someone who kept their sword.)
To: filospinato
NO now at 94%. That's a SUPER majority.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
40
posted on
08/05/2010 1:07:48 PM PDT
by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson