JUDGE: Having considered the trial evidence and the arguments of counsel, the court pursuant to FRCP 52(a) finds that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional and that its enforcement must be enjoined.
Interestingly, the law is completely and utterly fair. It is just that some are motivated to break it more than others. All homosexuals have the same rights the rest of us have - to marry a member of the opposite sex who is not a direct family member and neither of them is currently married.
Or are those limitations unconstitutional as well? ;)
Idiots.
Ideological and idiotic “decision” using 138 pages to strike down one sensible sentence...
They took a stand for their side; other than that, it means nothing - either way it was going to be decided in SCOTUS, so it was a political freebie for 9th Circus.
As usual, when liberals can’t win in the legislative areas, the resort to activist judges to get their way. First, the queers used a state judge to strike down a state law prohibiting homosexual marriage, then when the people amended their state constitution to prohibit it, they get a F*&KING FEDERAL JUDGE to overturn the will of the people.
A revolution is getting damned close. The people will not be lorded over by an elitist liberal ruling class.