To: screaminsunshine
The NYT is already trying to minimize it by saying that Republicans turned out in disproportionately large numbers because of more hotly contested primaries.
That begs the question: why didn't Democrats turn out in disproportionately large numbers to show their fervent support for Obamacare?
4 posted on
08/04/2010 1:44:10 AM PDT by
behzinlea
To: behzinlea
The socialists Obamulans will be in overdrive to minimize the damage. They are so disgusting. Ugghhh!
To: behzinlea; All
After some research, I see that SHANNON COUNTY (the poorest county in Missouri) voted 75% to 25% to reject ObamaCare.
The New York Slimes can suck it.
To: behzinlea
The NYT is already trying to minimize it by saying that Republicans turned out in disproportionately large numbers because of more hotly contested primaries. Even they have got to know how lame that sounds.
Grasping at straws.
7 posted on
08/04/2010 1:53:14 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: behzinlea
“That begs the question: why didn’t Democrats turn out in disproportionately large numbers to show their fervent support for Obamacare”?
...uh, couldn’t get the buses to the prisons in time?
21 posted on
08/04/2010 4:59:22 AM PDT by
albie
To: behzinlea
That begs the question: why didn't Democrats turn out in disproportionately large numbers to show their fervent support for Obamacare? Oh, there you go again-using logic.
23 posted on
08/04/2010 5:14:59 AM PDT by
libertylover
(The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
To: behzinlea; Steely Tom
The NYT is already trying to minimize it by saying that Republicans turned out in disproportionately large numbers because of more hotly contested primaries. Surprised they didn't blame BUSH or shout racism!
29 posted on
08/04/2010 7:21:22 AM PDT by
hoosiermama
(ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson