Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: James C. Bennett
And that helps the "disease" hypothesis proposed by null and void... how?

It doesn't. It just shows that in your quote in post #90, you don't know what you're talking about.

So let me get this right: the soldiers basically physically killed the supposedly “diseased” people - including the children and infants, then went on to round up the animals - both “diseased” and “healthy” - together, and separated them much later, to select the “healthy” ones for sacrifice.

Cheers!

135 posted on 08/02/2010 9:14:52 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers
It doesn't. It just shows that in your quote in post #90, you don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, that was the picture I got from what null and void was attempting to describe.

I composed that purely to test his "diseased animals" hypothesis / argument. Don't read any more into it, than that. I think null and void addressed the deficiencies of my replies satisfactorily in his later posts, if you had made the effort to follow up. After all the inconsistencies in my replies were eliminated by null and void, I placed a final hurdle that has been, so far, unsurpassed, thus leading to the end of that "theory" that the animals were killed because they were diseased, and not to satisfy the whims of a primitive deity / people.

137 posted on 08/02/2010 9:29:37 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers; Hank Kerchief
"I'd believe your bona fides more if you spent more time over in Londonistan, Islamabad, or Kandahar stopping people like this, rather than on a safe US-based internet forum damning Christianity with faint praise."

I find the way you square-dance onto other threads with line and snare, when the arguments made by you or your cohorts have been thoroughly vanquished, as a confirmation of the same. Imagine me putting up another well-won trophy on the shelf.

You've played this pathetic game before, and you're doing it again, now.

The Golden Rule, as always, wins. Tribal, Stone Age barbarism continues to get relegated to the dust-bins for lack of any ethical or moral value, as a result of the same.

That said, I've confronted more fanatical Muslims in all my travels around the world, including in Britain, Australia, the Middle East, the Subcontinent, the United States, East Asia and Canada, with a greater passion than I'd care for you to know about, or acknowledge. You, to put it succinctly, just don't matter.

Nice try playing this game, but as usual, reveals your weak and effeminate "tactics".

PS: What ever happened to your reply to me in that thread on laser-based weapons that your arrogance found itself painting you into a corner? Want to delve into it again... you know, to baffle me with your "brilliance"?

140 posted on 08/02/2010 9:44:25 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson