Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1L
For what cause of action? Defamation? No. She said it all, even if it wasn’t complete.

I don't get why people on our side are rolling over that since she talked about redemption she was wronged somehow. She said, in a nutshell, that she violated the law by discriminating against a person on the basis of race but that now she wouldnt do that anymore because she's evolved. Her reverand should be quite pleased but the law doesn't care if you change your mind, and I'll bet neither does that guy who probably lost his farm because he was white (and really, was he the only one?) Be welcome and forgiven? Sure. Keep your government job? No.

31 posted on 07/29/2010 10:17:18 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie

He didn’t lose his farm. She decided to help him after the lawyer “of his own kind” recommended letting it go. Apparently they worked something out. As you asked, how many others were treated similarly, but also, how detrimental was her begrudging service even when the farms were saved?


38 posted on 07/29/2010 10:43:54 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson