Stossel is totally dead wrong about this. Homosexual “marriage” means forcing all other citizens to accept and praise homosexuality. Homosexuals in the military means they’ll have a protected status with innumerable possibilities for the disruption of the mission.
Maybe other countries don’t have the same problems ... but it’s interesting that most of the countries he mentions aren’t defending themselves, anyway, so using their militaries as a opportunity for homos to get a uniform doesn’t mean anything.
Repealing DADT will adversely affect unit cohesiveness and our recruiting efforts. Who in their right mind wants to go to war with a queer?
The reason Stossel is wrong is because the military isn’t a job, it’s a lifestyle. Likewise gayness isn’t a medical condition or a handicap, it’s a lifestyle. And the two lifestyles don’t mix, period.
Stossel has been DEAD wrong a lot lately. First illegals, noe rump rangers. Go away John....we hardly knew ye.
Most of the countries aren’t defending themselves anyways
Good point.
What’s also interesting is why people don’t bother asking what is happening in the Caribbean. Jamaica has gays stoned to death in public by angry mobs, on a regular basis too. Is there any concern regarding that fact?