Replies

I will grant you that it is complex, and I can see that point. But people who aren’t just drinking the media kool-aid can recognize there’s a scam going on, and they can recognize that the courts say it’s nobody’s business whether the laws are kept or not.

We see that openly in the case of Arizona. And we see it more opaquely on the other issues you mentioned. Those who thought we were crazy before the election when we said Obama is a Marxist whose only friends have been terrorist Marxist are not thinking that’s so crazy any more. They see.

Perhaps the easiest images for people to understand are the items you mentioned. And you won’t hear me criticizing anybody for addressing those issues. They do need to be addressed, and those issues resonate with people because they do see the lawlessness involved.

But I think that lawlessness is precisely what people are reacting to, and a politician is better off just calling a spade a spade. All the politician would have to do in response to questions about the BC is to say that the same lawlessness which allowed Obama to illegally assume the presidency allowed him to take over the auto industry, healthcare, etc.... and it all needs to be stopped so that laws and not men rule this land.

Who could argue with that (besides the brain-dead and traitors, I mean)?

I agree with most all of what you have described in your two posts. But you will need to tell me what part(s) nullify the primary point here - the candidate cannot afford to waste time on an issue that will grant him little political traction.

Tell you what - you to go to all FR threads that are discussing high value campaign issues - health care, foreign policy, our troops and ROE issues in Afganistan, whatever - and you hijack each thread for the birther issue. Do that for a week and get back to me on how many times you were called a dumbass, and also why they are wrong.

All the politician would have to do in response to questions about the BC is to say that the same lawlessness which allowed Obama to illegally assume the presidency allowed him to take over the auto industry, healthcare, etc.... and it all needs to be stopped so that laws and not men rule this land.

Who could argue with that (besides the brain-dead and traitors, I mean)?

Many many many people who do not follow these issues as we do. No, they will not argue it, but they will be told what to think by a complicit media, just as so many were in 2008.

Like it or not, what you are suggesting plays into their hands. I can accept an average conservative joe not necessarily getting this (those people on the campaign trail) but we cannot afford to have GOP candidates that don't understand how to respond shrewdly.