Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clintonfatigued; LdSentinal; ExTexasRedhead; fieldmarshaldj; Impy
Norton's not a RINO (the issues page on her webpage sounds fine). But the problem isn't that she's too liberal, the problem is that she's been a total cipher as Lt. Governor. I mean, here in Illinois, the Lt. Governor is a totally powerless office AND Rod Blagojevich gave Quinn nothing to do, but that didn't stop him from injecting himself into the headlines on a routine basis.

By contrast, Norton's so obscure that people are likely to confuse her with Gale Norton (who IS a looney RINO). Given the pro-GOP climate in 2010, Jane Norton would probably win the general election, but my guess is she'd continue to be an invisible backbencher in the Senate.

I can't say I'm too fond of either candidate at this point. Norton's a bland non-entity and Buck is a gaffe-machine that appears to be biting the hand that feeds him. Remembers me of those no-win scenarios for conservatives when it comes to the Texas Governor's race.

57 posted on 07/25/2010 9:14:14 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy

The CA governor’s race is a lose/lose. Makes me ill.


59 posted on 07/25/2010 9:19:27 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Take back our country on November 2, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson