Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin and Newt, according to Fred Thompson and Rich Galen
Vanity | 07/24/2010 | Brices Crossroads

Posted on 07/24/2010 3:47:23 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads

Below is a transcript of a portion of Fred Thompson's interview with Rich Galen on his radio show July 23, 2010 in which Thompson and Galen discuss the relative merits of Gingrich and Palin, as well as the likelihood that either or both will enter the GOP.

Galen is a former press Secretary to Gingrich, and he gives the back of his hand to Sarah Palin in the interview, calling her "a really interesting personalit[y]...but not necessarily ... qualified to be the nominee or be president." Incredibly, and to his discredit, Thompson laughingly agrees:

"THOMPSON: Uh huh...

GALEN: And uh, I don’t think Sarah Palin’s ever going to be the nominee. I don’t think she believes that she can be the nominee and I’m not sure she wants to get into that. I mean, I think she’s, uh...you know...she’s doing what she does and she’s doing what she does better than anybody we’ve seen in a long time.

THOMPSON: You know she may be in the first stages of Newtism, and that is, uh, being...being a real player and going around the country making lots of money. (Laughs)

GALEN: Yeah, and ...

THOMPSON: That’s what Newt’s done for a long time and maybe he’s ready...maybe he’s ready for the next stage and maybe, uh, you’re right. Maybe Sarah’s idea is that she’ll do this for a while and then her second stage will come along a little later."

As someone who supported Fred Thompson in 2007-8 both on this forum and financially, I am bitterly disappointed that, at a minimum, he did not correct Galen's outrageous statement that she is unqualified to be either the nominee or the President. I know Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin would have defended her because I have heard them both do it. In fact, Galen would never even have made such an outrageous statement in front of them because he would know it would draw a harsh refudiation from either El Rushbo or the Great One. (In fact, I heard Levin take Ann Coulter to task one time because she trashed Thompson).

Instead, he says "uh huh" and proceeds to amplify Galen's canard by citing the lamestream media/GOP Establishment wishful thinking-spin that she is too happy making money to run. Galen is a RINO "gun for hire" and former employee of Gingrich. He is not admirable, but he is doing what he is paid for. Fred Thompson has no such excuse. Shame on him.

The transcript of the entire segment on Newt and Palin is below:

"THOMPSON: Rich Galen, the founder of Mullings.com, the wit and wisdom of Rich Galen uh, if you want to check that out. Rich, you’ve been around here a long time, uh, you worked for Newt Gingrich, you worked for Dan Quayle and, uh, GOPAC and uh...

GALEN: And Fred Thompson..

THOMPSON: Yeah, I thank you much for that. We had a lot of fun on the campaign trail. They’re coming out of the woodwork now. Do you think Newt might be serious this time...?

GALEN: Yeah I do...

THOMPSON: You know Newt pretty well and Newt, this time of the year every four years you know, uh, says, “Well, I’m thinking about it, I’m thinking about it” and then he doesn’t. What do you think?

GALEN: Yeah, I think that, uh, that this time, unless there is some..something pops up between now and next February that says “don’t do it”, he’s...I think he’s disposed to do it. So I think he’s gonna be a candidate.

THOMPSON: Is that right? How do you think he figures...is it as clear as, you know, it seems to be, and that is that Obama is very unpopular and, uh, he can’t come back like Reagan did, uh, in his second two years and be re-elected?

GALEN: And Clinton did...

THOMPSON: And Clinton did...

GALEN: Yeah, you can’t..I don’t think you can project that far out. I think what Newt is...and I’m putting words in his mouth; I haven’t discussed this with him...I have discussed the first part with him, but not this part.

THOMPSON: Uh huh...

GALEN: The, uh, I think what Newt is looking at is A) the Republican competition, first of all. I mean, it doesn’t matter whether the incumbent can be defeated. If you’re not the nominee then it doesn’t make any difference. Um, and uh, I think he looks across the landscape, uh and he sees some really interesting personalities.

THOMPSON: (Loudly laughs) You’ve been in town too long Rich, you’re becoming too diplomatic. (Loudly laughs again)

GALEN: But not necessarily people who are qualified to be the nominee or be president.

THOMPSON: Uh huh...

GALEN: And uh, I don’t think Sarah Palin’s ever going to be the nominee. I don’t think she believes that she can be the nominee and I’m not sure she wants to get into that. I mean, I think she’s, uh...you know...she’s doing what she does and she’s doing what she does better than anybody we’ve seen in a long time.

THOMPSON: You know she may be in the first stages of Newtism, and that is, uh, being...being a real player and going around the country making lots of money. (Laughs)

GALEN: Yeah, and ...

THOMPSON: That’s what Newt’s done for a long time and maybe he’s ready...maybe he’s ready for the next stage and maybe, uh, you’re right. Maybe Sarah’s idea is that she’ll do this for a while and then her second stage will come along a little later.

GALEN: There’s no, uh, I mean there’s no advantage for somebody like Sarah Palin to absolutely do, uh, you know, do a, uh, what’s the statement that we always talk about?

THOMPSON: Sherman-like...

GALEN: A Sherman statement, you know, if nominated I will not run. If elected, I will not serve. I mean, it doesn’t do any good to take herself out of the running. It makes good sense for her to be among the mentioned and, uh, you know why get in the way of that? Next Spring, sometime, she’ll decide what she wants to do and everybody will react to it then. But uh,...

THOMPSON: Uh huh...

GALEN: Yeah, I think the threshold question is I think Newt is serious about it.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich; newt; newtgingrich; palin; romney; romneyantipalin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-356 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2010 3:47:27 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DTogo; sarasota; NurdlyPeon; Do Be; PA Engineer; Jeff Head; kanawa; Dave W; fanfan; WVNan; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/24/2010 3:48:27 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Newt is a POS. I liked Fred but he should have been all in in 2008. We could have used him.


3 posted on 07/24/2010 3:50:44 PM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Fred disappointed us then. Why should We not be surprised that he was couldn’t even bring himself to defend her as qualified, even though she is the only Constitutionalist of the four top ones.


4 posted on 07/24/2010 3:53:29 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Fred is dead; long live Fred.
.


5 posted on 07/24/2010 3:56:07 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

i think there is still someone in the shadows...


6 posted on 07/24/2010 3:56:39 PM PDT by latina4dubya ( self-proclaimed tequila snob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

No matter how many times he gets reupholstered The Couch Sitter will never live down his adultery.


7 posted on 07/24/2010 3:57:16 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (RIP Bahbah. About time you plugged the damn hole daddy! Palin/Cheney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

And next time please attach the obligatory Barf Alert!
.


8 posted on 07/24/2010 3:57:31 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
Sarah Palin in 2012, uh-huh, you betcha. Buy drug stocks, the sale of antidepressants is going to go through the roof.
9 posted on 07/24/2010 3:58:41 PM PDT by JPG (Sarah Spitz? No, she swallowed the Obama agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
I still think Newt has a place in a Palin adm. He is a smart guy but the above is what you get when you hang around dc too long and always go out of your way to get along with the other side as Newt has done for waaaay too long while they are cutting you to shreds behind your back.
10 posted on 07/24/2010 3:59:04 PM PDT by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Sorry, Should have done that. But i kinda though mentioning Rich Galen in the title served that purpose. LOL


11 posted on 07/24/2010 3:59:15 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Newt has been told for so long and by so many people that he’s the smartest kid in the class, the dope actually believes it.

Those who thought Reagan was just a simple-minded ex-actor said the same things about him that are often said about Palin. And in the end, is ANY President remembered for his academic brilliance or ability to regurgitate facts and data? (Name one). No, they’re remembered for the quality of their character and the vision they bring and act upon.


12 posted on 07/24/2010 3:59:25 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
I still appreciate Fred for being a stouter-than-most small-government voice...

And he could be right. Sarah may actually prefer not being in the MSM cross-hairs 24-7. They certainly chased her out of the Governor's chair. She'd remain relevant, would do a great job of promoting the small-government cause, and could do well for her own financial self. Ain't nuttin' wrong with any o' that.

13 posted on 07/24/2010 4:01:01 PM PDT by Teacher317 (I'm sore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

“I still think Newt has a place in a Palin adm”

He might. But Rich Galen?


14 posted on 07/24/2010 4:01:05 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
I believe the 2012 GOP Primary will come down to Palin, Newt and Romney.

By the time they hit SC, it'll be down to Palin and Newt.

I believe Newt has a shot, even though he's unlikeable and somewhat unsteady in his convictions.

The a lot of folks on the "moderate" side of the GOP...and MOST Independents that would vote for him over Palin.

Right or wrong, that's the way I see it shaking down.

15 posted on 07/24/2010 4:02:36 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

GALEN: There’s no, uh, I mean there’s no advantage for somebody like Sarah Palin to absolutely do, uh, you know, do a, uh, what’s the statement that we always talk about?

ME: That you’re a complete dickhead, Rich?


16 posted on 07/24/2010 4:02:48 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“Newt has been told for so long and by so many people that he’s the smartest kid in the class, the dope actually believes it.

Those who thought Reagan was just a simple-minded ex-actor said the same things about him that are often said about Palin.”

Bears repeating. Newt is not the big genius everyone thinks. He believes in man made Climate change, a dopey position.


17 posted on 07/24/2010 4:03:24 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Newt is presidentially DEAD to me.


18 posted on 07/24/2010 4:03:24 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Palin has a lot of set-to, entrenched politicians of all stripes scared.

Good.

How Sarah Palin Trumps Liberalism
http://www.jeffhead.com/palin/


19 posted on 07/24/2010 4:03:31 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

Princess Leia?


20 posted on 07/24/2010 4:04:22 PM PDT by dockkiller (COME AND TAKE IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-356 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson