Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan Just Showed Why U.S. Democrats Will Be Doomed If They Try To Raise Taxes
The Business Insider ^ | Vincent Fernando, CFA

Posted on 07/11/2010 4:04:04 PM PDT by blam

Japan Just Showed Why U.S. Democrats Will Be Doomed If They Try To Raise Taxes

Vincent Fernando, CFA
Jul. 11, 2010, 11:53 AM

Japan's incumbent political party suffered a massive defeat at the polls this Sunday, as upper house elections left the Democratic Party of Japan with just 47 seats.

The result was far short of prime minister Naoto Kan's 54-seat goal, though the DPJ should still retain power due to their majority in the lower house.

So what's being blamed for their defeat this Sunday? Trying to raise taxes:

Reuters:

"Kan lost the election calling for a sales tax hike," said Koichi Haji, chief economist at NLI Research Institute.

"That is a huge setback for fiscal reform. Now the question is whether Kan can stay in power or not."

The Democrats swept to power last year promising to cut waste and focus spending on consumers to boost growth. Public backing nosedived due to indecisive leadership and while government ratings rose when Kan took over last month, they slipped after he floated a rise in the 5 percent sales tax to help rein in debt.

PM VULNERABLE

A poor election outcome leaves Kan vulnerable to a challenge from party powerbroker Ichiro Ozawa -- a critic of his sales tax hike proposal -- ahead of a September party leadership vote. Few, though, would expect Kan to go without a fight.

Without a coalition majority, the Democrats will need to seek new allies, hampering their push for fiscal reform including a possible sales tax hike.

This is an example of how voters can initially decry budget deficits, but then punish the party who tries to raise taxes as a solution, even the party they once showed overwhelming support for.

[snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; elections; markets; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2010 4:04:09 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

This was an ill-considered article. The Democrats have already decided to raise taxes, by letting the Bush tax cuts lapse—after the election.

So if the election is a Republican sweep, the big question is “Will the Republican congress vote to restore the tax cuts?”

The follow up question is, “If the Republicans do this, will Obama veto the restored tax cuts?”

If he does, it’s highly unlikely that the new congress will override his veto, because it will be over another year before they have to face the voters again.

This means that the last question, is “Who will the taxpayers blame for higher taxes?”


2 posted on 07/11/2010 4:13:16 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Only those that pay taxes will get upset.


3 posted on 07/11/2010 4:13:37 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Isn't enough always enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This is an example of how voters can initially decry budget deficits, but then punish the party who tries to raise taxes as a solution, even the party they once showed overwhelming support for.

And rightly so. Anyone with a bit of common sense knows that raising taxes in a time of budget deficits and economic weakness is a recipe for declining revenue. Why the political class can't seem to understand this is anyone's guess.

4 posted on 07/11/2010 4:14:35 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

“This election is lost”” Dingy


5 posted on 07/11/2010 4:20:19 PM PDT by timetostand (Ya say ya wanna revolution -- OK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Taxes are going up automatically after the first of the year, and no one votes on it, so what’s the point?


6 posted on 07/11/2010 4:30:08 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Marking Time On The Government's Dime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

this

and that number is far too small.


7 posted on 07/11/2010 4:37:08 PM PDT by Hexenhammer (sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

Mmph....

Disagree.

The sales tax was ONE issue, but more importantly in my opinion, was the Japanese public’s desire to punish the DPJ.

There are several reasons for that desire.

First and foremost, however, was former Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama’s failure to divorce himself from DPJ Secretary General Ichiro Ozawa, who despite numerous financial scandals, refused to step down and thus made the DPJ appear just as corrupt and tainted as the LDP — in addition to being incompetent.

The second most important issue was the Futemna controversy. Futemna was Hatoyama’s “Gitmo”. A throwaway promise made during a campaign on an issue that he had not seriously researched and thus thought he could solve with the stroke of a pen.

When that, and numerous other promises, proved impossible to fulfill, despite majorities in both houses, the Japanese public reactions went from shock to anger, to exasperation, to wry amusement at their own foolishness for ever believing that the DPJ was in any way different than the LDP.

Having said all that, do not count Naoto Kan out yet. He does not quite have the charisma of former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, but he has reacted quite strongly to slap Ozawa down to size and he does have a pretty clean reputation both as a reformer and as a realist.

Providing he is willing to work with the LDP, something that Hatoyama never bothered to try, he might get some thing accomplished. For all their faults, the LDP knows how to work the actual levers of government and the DPJ has proven abundantly that they don’t.

As for the sales tax... everyone knows it’s going to go up sooner or later... they don’t like it much, but they can do the math. The deficit has to be cut somehow, and Japanese social spending enjoys wide-based support because of the nature of Japan’s homogeneous society.

Bottom line, this article is a piece of superficial crap.


8 posted on 07/11/2010 4:50:18 PM PDT by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

“This was an ill-considered article. The Democrats have already decided to raise taxes, by letting the Bush tax cuts lapse—after the election.”

Actually, much more than that. The so-called Deficit Reduction Task Force is due to report, just after the election and they WILL force through new things like a VAT, end of Social Security Earnings Cap, probably a mileage (i.e., driving) tax, and just about anything else they can think of to make us a World-Class Country.

The Dems will vote for the whole package, since it will be all or nothing and they will want to leave the country with a going-away present.


9 posted on 07/11/2010 4:51:38 PM PDT by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Fear the Voter!


10 posted on 07/11/2010 5:23:40 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

This was an ill-considered article. The Democrats have already decided to raise taxes, by letting the Bush tax cuts lapse—after the election.”

What has been truly evil has been the campaign of lies the Democrats and willing media accomplices have engaged in to distort what is really going on in taxes.

It’s been a failure of the Republicans to not pound on these 3 issues - jobs, taxes and fiscal responsibility. The Democrats have struck out on all 3.


11 posted on 07/11/2010 5:53:59 PM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’ve even had self-described liberals admit that raising taxes in a recession is stupid and counter-productive. If the democrats let the Bush tax cuts expire, even liberals will question their sanity.


12 posted on 07/11/2010 6:17:24 PM PDT by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

http://atr.org/six-months-untilbr-largest-tax-hikes-a5171


13 posted on 07/11/2010 6:19:47 PM PDT by listenhillary (November is just the first step! If we falter after that step, the win will mean nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
If the House has sufficient Republicans to override a Presidential veto, the Senate will go along with them.

Few Democrats have a taste for the total wipeout that will ensue in 2012 if they don't.

Actually, the wipeout may occur in 2011!

14 posted on 07/11/2010 6:20:53 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

The Democrats will NOT raise taxes between now and the November elections. With a few exceptions their campaigns have for decades been based on running as a moderate then voting liberal until shortly before the election when they slide back into their fake image of the patriotic moderate.


15 posted on 07/11/2010 6:24:09 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (DeMint 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Demos need to do NOTHING to raise taxes..
Bush tax cuts will sunset all by themselves soon..
16 posted on 07/11/2010 6:29:44 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

That’s the key. But of course it is the Democrats who refused to continue them, therefore, they are in fact responsible for the upcoming tax increases. Now getting the general public to acknowledge that is way more difficult than it should be.


17 posted on 07/11/2010 6:34:13 PM PDT by Lurkus Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

>>Only those that pay taxes will get upset.

See my tagline.


18 posted on 07/11/2010 6:37:36 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

They don’t care if they lose—they got 0bamaCare (which is guaranteed to usher in single payer and rot the hearts, minds and culture of the US.)

If your shiny new conservatives don’t repeal 0bamaCare, and undo the massive damage that has been perpetrated on this country, then a November victory won’t mean diddly-squat.

You had better vote-in right-wingers and then keep the fire under their britches, or the time-bomb that is 0bamaCare will finish us off—I would bet everything I own on it.

If they manage to foist Cap ‘n Tax on us, which is likely, then that will have to be undone as well, or we will fall just the same.


19 posted on 07/11/2010 6:54:20 PM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

The primary people the Bush tax cuts expiring will affect are higher income earners. They will know exactly who to blame.


20 posted on 07/11/2010 11:05:33 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson