Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Physics: Proton radius smaller than believed, European scientists say
LA Times ^ | July 7, 2010 | Thomas H. Maugh II

Posted on 07/07/2010 9:06:34 PM PDT by smokingfrog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: tet68
are you saying you don't fit the standard model?
if so, please turn yourself in at the nearest government medical facility.
41 posted on 07/07/2010 9:55:20 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
The peanut shape is produced by quarks traveling nearly at light speed and spinning the same direction as the proton.


42 posted on 07/07/2010 9:55:24 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: coon2000

In reality we were all sneezed out of the nose of the Great Green Arkelsiezure, and you will all pay during the coming of the great white hankerchief


43 posted on 07/07/2010 9:58:30 PM PDT by Mr. K (Physically unable to proofread- I swear I try!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
Actually, protons are shaped like soccer balls.

Do the neutrons look like this?


44 posted on 07/07/2010 9:59:25 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Sophisticated measurements from experiments indicate the radius is 4% smaller than thought.

What? This cannot be true! If I'd have known this five minutes ago...never mind. We've got a really big problem but I think I can fix it. Can someone fetch me a #5 left handed monkeywrench, 13 rolls of duct tape and a purple gimp mask?

45 posted on 07/07/2010 9:59:31 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix
It's all done with lasers and some very sophisticated equipment.

stuned beeber Pictures, Images and Photos">

46 posted on 07/07/2010 10:00:45 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( - Eccl. 10:18 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Maybe protons are shrinking due to global warming, obviously George W. Bush’s fault.


47 posted on 07/07/2010 10:02:04 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
I’ll *never* be the same again.

Not even if we get you a new pair of fishnet stockings?

48 posted on 07/07/2010 10:02:38 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

All of us small blue creatures, with 50 arms each, and who invented deodorant before the wheel?

I have to dig out “Restaurant” when I get home.


49 posted on 07/07/2010 10:02:38 PM PDT by Darth Tokarev (Liberalism: Using intellectualism to justify moral cowardice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dangus; Hoodat
But the amount of space it takes up is spherical because it moves at high speed. It’s actually a wave.

Take any point on a sphere, and roll the sphere along a path.

The trace of the point will make a wave on a chart.

Now, that has absolutely nothing to do this, of course.

50 posted on 07/07/2010 10:03:47 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Wow! That contraption has TWO steering wheels!


51 posted on 07/07/2010 10:04:47 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dangus
and I’d be lying if I told you I understood it.

That remark alone proves you are more intelligent than most of us. And a darn sight more honest.

52 posted on 07/07/2010 10:06:34 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob
It is a well-known fact that it has a lot of surface tension.

Must be what makes everyone so uptight.

53 posted on 07/07/2010 10:09:23 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
However, a proton is still larger than Obummer’s brain.


54 posted on 07/07/2010 10:11:04 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

Hydrogen atom walks into a bar, says, “Gimme a beer, I’m kind of down. I lost my electron.” Bartender says, “Are you sure?” Hydrogen atom says, “I’m positive.”

Is this thing working?


55 posted on 07/07/2010 10:14:37 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
Atomic spectroscopy measures transitions of the electrons between orbits in the atom, and does not depend on the details of structure of the proton.

More or less the same way they detect planets orbiting distant stars.

56 posted on 07/07/2010 10:14:37 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lefty-lie-spy
but a few quarks can still be any shape you want them to be.

That sounds strange.

57 posted on 07/07/2010 10:16:24 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

I think it best we not tell Al Gore about this.


58 posted on 07/07/2010 10:17:03 PM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I don’t think so. Not a sine wave, anyway. The point will move more slowly when it’s near the bottom, and more quickly near the top, resulting in something more like a series of hops than a sine wave.


59 posted on 07/07/2010 10:17:14 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Or, if the Rydberg constant is correct, the smaller size of a proton could mean the equations in QED theory will fail to work.

That's ok. We'll just make up a new theory.

60 posted on 07/07/2010 10:19:34 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson