Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WaPo Art Critic Slams Norman Rockwell as Lacking 'Courage'
NewsBusters ^ | July 5, 2010 | P.J. Gladnick

Posted on 07/05/2010 6:05:27 PM PDT by PJ-Comix

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last
To: PJ-Comix
Gopnik

Hello, Central Casting? Send us up a Gopnik...

81 posted on 07/05/2010 9:29:50 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

Good one!


82 posted on 07/05/2010 9:30:52 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
Thanks.


83 posted on 07/05/2010 9:36:32 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance; mylife; Brucifer; uamadan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cufxck9uIDQ
chocolat


84 posted on 07/05/2010 9:38:24 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

In 1999, The New Yorker art critic Peter Schjeldahl said of Rockwell in ArtNews: “Rockwell is terrific. It’s become too tedious to pretend he isn’t.”


85 posted on 07/05/2010 9:38:37 PM PDT by drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

Great one! I just made it my screen background (replacing another truly American icon/artist - the Grateful Dead).


86 posted on 07/05/2010 9:42:02 PM PDT by drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

Great one! I just made it my screen background (replacing another truly American icon/artist - the Grateful Dead).


87 posted on 07/05/2010 9:42:02 PM PDT by drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: drew

Axis of Evil

88 posted on 07/05/2010 10:04:22 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

Thanks SO MUCH for that link! I sent it on to grandsons, who are scouts. They all went to SeaBase this summer.


89 posted on 07/05/2010 10:09:02 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Rockwell reliably keeps us right in the middle of our comfort zone.

Certainly seems to knock Blake Gopnik out of his "comfort zone."

I guess I'm something of an odd duck as far as art. I'm a design school grad, have painted a bit, and enjoy Norman Rockwell as well more obscure and abstract Soviet Constructivism and Suprematism. There is beauty to be found in any number of styles, and abstract art is not just a jumble of colors and shapes if you understand color theory and have an eye for composition.

What passes for "art" in very recent decades, however, is purely political and highly reactionary. It's assessed as an acceptable artistic endeavor or not due to whether or not it pisses off the right people. It's crossed the line from the (perhaps over-) intellectualized, intentional break with realism of the early twentieth century, an effort to break with the past to create a "new" art for a new world, one that went rapidly awry as the best laid plans of mice and men are wont to do, and has gone right into what is tantamount to taking a dump on the front porch of people you don't like.

Matter of fact, there's a peculiar fascination with human excreta in today's political propaganda pawned off as art. It makes even genuine propaganda, from late fifties Cuba, or Soviet worker posters or even the forbidden yet oddly magnetic Nazi efforts, seem glowing and beautiful by comparison. You see that fascination with good design, deft use of color theory and good composition, popping up with great frequency in the oddest of places, particularly in popular entertainment.

Which brings us back to Norman Rockwell, whose art is experiencing something of a revival, especially among the very same leftist afficianados who formerly trashed him and detested his work. Rockwell was no conservative himself. He wouldn't have been, of course, working primarily as an illustrator for The Saturday Evening Post. The reason he's having a revival isn't quite what many of us conservatives might hope. Like the fascination with propaganda from elsewhere in the world, due to deft use of color theory, excellent composition and a certain magnetism that tugs at the emotions, this trait is recognized and coveted now in Rockwell.

It's coveted as memorabilia. Memorabilia of a world they believe to no longer exist, therefore it's safe to display artifacts from it. If you are acquainted with many southern black people of means, I'd compare it to their having begun to collect somewhat racist old paintings, statuary, ectectera that anyone else would deem unacceptable. Watermelon print fabric, Amos & Andy stuff, the stereotypical "yard boy" hitching statue. They collect it because they see themselves as past it. To own it is to have triumphed over it.

So, don't get too excited about some revival of Norman Rockwell. It doesn't mean what some may think it means.

90 posted on 07/05/2010 10:09:49 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Gopnik describes Rockwell lacking “courage”, and characterized by “unending cliche” presumably because it reflects mainstream American values. Well, an artist’s values are implied in the work of any honest artist.

In Rockwell the values implied are an affirmation of life in America. Gopnik, on the other hand, believes that “This country is about a game-changing guarantee that equal room will be made for Latino socialists, disgruntled lesbian spinsters, foul-mouthed Jewish comics...” and whataever personal problem he seems to be hinting that he has. The implication is that if you are NOT a neurotic malcontent bent on the destruction of civilization, not only are you a coward, but you are boring and not worthy of being taken seriously.

The work of deconstructionist artists like Gopnik is designed to destroy the values of the artist’s audience along with any nascent capacity for rational thought. The purpose of this psychological con job is to make them vulnerable to radical propaganda. What can be more dishonest than that, and since when does it require “courage” to perpetrate devious propaganda in a free society?

I recall Ayn Rand (like her or not) appearing on the Johnny Carson show during the 1960’s. Referring to the “Theater of the Absurd” fad, and it’s chief practitioner, Edwards Albee, she remarked “If Edward Albee really thinks that life is absurd, one must conclude that Edward Albee is absurd”. The audience roared at that one.


91 posted on 07/05/2010 10:58:07 PM PDT by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

“They collect it because they see themselves as past it. To own it is to have triumphed over it.”

Interesting stuff.


92 posted on 07/05/2010 11:04:38 PM PDT by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Rockwell’s art is being criticized by people who aren’t talented enough to clean his paint brushes. What courage they have!!


93 posted on 07/06/2010 1:14:22 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
I don't know of Ed Hooper but this one has always been my favorite Hopper painting. The starkness of Hopper's paintings is so vivid in its' expression. One of my all time fav singer-songwriters has a GREAT song called "Nighthawks at the Diner" and I always thing of Hopper's painting....


94 posted on 07/06/2010 2:20:02 AM PDT by newfreep (Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hellbender

“The greatness of Rockwell, like that of America, is lost on the Left.”

You nailed it. Norman Rockwell is to the art world what Sarah Palin is to the political word - not of the groomed elite establishment, but an honest, capable and loving representative of the American people’s hopes and aspirations and values.


95 posted on 07/06/2010 4:46:39 AM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Rockwell’s painting is inaccurate. It was the black guy (James Chaney) that was shot last. The guy with the slight beard who is holding Chaney, I assume is Michael Schwerner. But Schwerner was shot and killed first.


96 posted on 07/06/2010 4:58:59 AM PDT by lowbridge (Rep. Dingell: "Its taken a long time.....to control the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: windcliff
I would love one of those at work.

Dude! (Or Dudess as the case may be.)

Search
97 posted on 07/06/2010 5:06:43 AM PDT by Peet (<- A.K.A. the Foundling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
Our little town celebrated Independence Day on July 5th because the 4th fell on a Sunday. At 7a.m. three bleacher stands were filled to overflowing with people standing in the town square. Patriotic songs were sung by the town chorus. The Boy Scouts raised the flag. The Pledge recited. Veterans honored. A state dignitary gave a speech. Afterward there was a town pancake breakfast.

In the afternoon we had an art exhibit by the town artists. Musicians played throughout the day. Flags everywhere. And...Great fireworks in the evening, of course.

Norman Rockwell would have had plenty of material to work with in our town.

98 posted on 07/06/2010 5:40:49 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Gopnik is part of the “demoralization” of which Yuri Besmenov warned. Next step: Demoralization.
99 posted on 07/06/2010 5:41:57 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I too initially was drawn to his work because of the nautical themed works as I worked and played in and on the oceans of the world. However, some of his Civil War work for Harper’s Weekly is also good.


100 posted on 07/06/2010 6:17:24 AM PDT by ExpatGator (I hate Illinois Nazis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson