[Gaffer]

What am I referring to? Look, I'm not trying to be disrectful or ridicule you but your question tells me that you must not have any daughters or grand daughters. If you do, I don't think you'd have to ask.

Regardless, I'll explain. This man is responsible for a particularly eggregious campaign to make money at the expense of the morals of young women. He had a great idea as ideas go...catch young women on spring break, etc. and persuade them to show themselves (usually drunk). He's made a culture out of this and SELLS the results to horny old men who masturbate to these works of cultural art. It is disgusting, misleading and demeaning to these women, even if they think they did it willingly.

If I were to see him face-to-face and I'd punch his f@cking lights out, period.

[krb]

What do you think about the other theory, that this Joe guy didn't make these people do anything, that he merely exposes girls whose fathers didn't do their job?

[TheZMan]

...

This is like the argument that strippers are being exploited. They chose to do it.

My wife and her friends can be seen in one of the early GGW videos, but only one of them signed the release to be a part of the show and was "included" in what you refer to as being exploited.

[Republic of Texas]

I doubt his new bride will care. She’s probably a Democrat and besides, after she divorces him and takes half, where he got the money won’t matter to her. You are right though, they are both scumbags.