[Christian_Capitalist]

You mean as scientific as *Some how all this chemical soup came together and started life, inanimate substances assembling into sentient life.*

That's not scientific at all. That statement violates Pasteur's Law of Biogenesis -- and, of course, in keeping with that Scientific Law, no example of random Abiogenesis of self-replicating Life has ever been observed in any laboratory, anywhere. There's just zero laboratory support for that Evolutionist Myth, anywhere in the world, any time in history. Children should not be taught silly Evolutionist fantasies which violate known Scientific Law -- that's just Child Abuse, IMHO.

But, you knew that already. :-)

[MrB]

*Some how all this chemical soup came together and started life, inanimate substances assembling into sentient life.*

Imageo Goo instead of Imageo Dei.

Yes, that difference in assumption is going to have huge worldview implications.