Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
[FR  V e r y  S  L   O    W]

Today Rush was saying that he could never get elected to anything because he could never pander. I guess Snerdly must have asked him if acquiring and holding an audience wasn't similar to attracting voters.

My thought was that it would be if only people of some reasonable intellect were allowed to vote. But now we let the "useful idiots" vote; and Rush is right because he could never attract and hold such people.

ML/NJ

9 posted on 06/21/2010 4:27:08 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj
My thought was that it would be if only people of some reasonable intellect were allowed to vote.

Can't measure "intellect" but you can measure "net taxayer" at all levels of gummint. Seems fair to have some "skin in the game".

19 posted on 06/21/2010 4:48:36 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj
My thought was that it would be if only people of some reasonable intellect were allowed to vote.

This was why the founders originally only allowed property holders to vote. With their taxes it was felt they had a stake in the outcome of an election (remember no income tax back then). I'd like to extend that to all those who pay income taxes for the same reasons. If you're on a program or a government employee you can't vote. Under that rule I'd be ineligible until I found a job, but I'd take it over the mobocracy we currently have.

23 posted on 06/21/2010 4:58:16 PM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson