[Da Coyote]

For once, I am on the union side.

Enough with the outsource.

Let’s outsource business “leaders” instead.

It appears that our current crop are clones of Dilbert’s pointy head boss.

Oh, and while we’re at it - if they’ve got MBAs, fire them.

If they’ve got Harvard MBAs, first torture, then kill them.

[BipolarBob]

Ditto

[Dixie Yooper]

For once, I am on the union side

Really? This is the first time ever? B.S.! You either pay union dues or live off union dues to stick your neck out and make that claim over this lame of a story.

[who_would_fardels_bear]

The small aircraft manufacturers were whining up a storm years back when a luxury tax was proposed.

Oh you can't do that, the industry will go to pot, and all those jobs will be lost.

What they really meant to say was: Oh no you can't do that or our bonuses will be cut.

[dennisw]

I support these union workers. Lots of freepers are too stupid to see the difference between them and gubbermint unions. They just lump all unions together so as not to stress their minds too much. Outsourcing...not a big deal to them. These union workers are tax payers not tax eaters

Its nice to live on a cloud

[TopQuark]

"If they’ve got Harvard MBAs, first torture, then kill them."

Yes, down with knowledge, back to the caves!

You are a the original .conservative, my friend.

[Oceander]

Hardly. Perhaps if unions hadn't been so intent on buying political votes and using political pressure to obtain advantages they could not have bargained for fair and square they might have some redeeming qualities; however, they don't. They have been foursquare in the vanguard of the corrupt and the venal sheparding crony capitalism into all aspects of political life, and deserve nothing more than being forced to bear the inevitable consequences of their own corrupt behaviour. If unions and union members don't like outsourcing, they have only themselves to blame.