Do Democrats think before they vote?

Youtube ^ | June 14, 2010 | Chatter4

[chatter4]

Great video with two interviews of SC Senate hopeful Alvin Greene. Do Democrats think before they vote? Alvin "Pinata" Greene, a South Carolina Democrat, won the US Senate primary despite never making a public appearance. He is unknown, unemployed and facing felony obscenity charges. He had been discharged "involuntarily" from the Army and showed no signs of having run a campaign in recent months — no advertising, no staff, no money. Actually, it's beginning to look like Greene won because he was the first person on the ballot with a "D" after his name. Clearly this man is not qualfied to be a Senator and once again the media didn't even bother to check his background until after the election. Now the Democrats are claiming that he was "planted" by Republicans, and no doubt will try to blame Bush for this, but, bottom line, they voted for him, having no idea who he was, so I say, "He Won! Get used to it!"

[Genoa]

I'll take Alvin Greene over Bob Etheridge any time.

[caver]

He has as many qualifications as Barry.

[Little Ray]

There was a bit about Democrat voter saying Greene’s name sounded black.

Tell ya a little more about the Democrat constituency in South Carolina.

[Outlaw Woman]

Maybe they were thinking...maybe the Dems in SC are so fed up with the incumbent, and they still can't bring themselves to vote R, that Greene won fair and square. It's quite a slap to the Dems. The message: We'll take anyone over what we have

[Buckeye McFrog]

shows they will pull the lever for absolutey ANYONE who a) is black, and b) has a “D” next to their name (bet Barry is feeling real good about that these days....)

[bcsco]

What you say is true. But there’s nothing ‘ridiculous’ about the first-name-on-the-ballot point. It’s the way far too many voters (especially on the D side...) look at voting. I’d bet that even had the Black voter percentages been lower, he’d still get the nomination. Too many people pay no attention to elections until the walk into the voting booth.

[Outlaw Woman]

Ethridge is in NC isn’t he?

[theDentist]

Yes, they think “Where’s the ‘D’? Where’s the ‘D’?”

[Genoa]

Ethridge is in NC isn’t he?

Yes, just comparing two examples in today's headlines.

[Moby Grape]

Do they think before they vote? The real question is do they think at ALL?

[bcsco]

Tell ya a little more about the Democrat constituency in South Carolina.

I knew that when posting. But I wanted to address the mindless attitude of D voters in general. Even had the percentage of Blacks voting been less, I believe he'd still get the nomination. Far too many voters pay little attention to elections until they enter the voting booth. And that's far higher on the D side than it is for Republicans. Far higher.

[Outlaw Woman]

Gotchya

[stylin19a]

Clearly this man is not qualfied to be a Senator

Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution sets three qualifications for senators: 1) each senator must be at least 30 years old, 2) must have been a citizen of the United States for at least the past nine years, and 3) must be (at the time of the election) an inhabitant of the state he or she seeks to represent.

[MrB]

Actually, an in depth analysis reveals that they think, but only up to a certain point. That point is where their “logic” affirms their moral superiority.

Examples:
“I support the concept of man-caused global warming because I want to feel good about myself for saving the planet.”

“I support welfare becaue the poor need help.”

“I support affirmative action because I want to give minorities a boost.”

[Paladin2]

“Rats don’t think, they just emote.

[Moby Grape]

Agreed:

“I support all these causes as long as I don’t ACTUALLY have to get involved...as long as someone’s tax dollars are used to pretend to do something about it and I don’t have to get my hands dirty.”

[FrankR]

Rememer Ann's book..."If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans".

That's what all the "dumbing down" in the public schools over the past 50 years has been about...getting the population too dumb to think for themselves. They have been trained to believe anything they're told.

I find it hard to believe that in this day and time there are race pimps going around still convincing people that the whites want to bring back slavery, or jim crow laws. They are obviously too stupid to know that it could never happen again.

The Purple Lipped Peacock talks to the stupid people, the chia pets of America; those who can plainly see the sky is blue, but will believe it's orange if told to do so by "community organizers".

Take these people out of their "group", and they would stand like button-eyed robots with their batteries missing...they could not function. Like flocks of birds and/or schools of fish, they turn on command and blindly follow the leader into the net of socialism.

Make no mistake, obama was elected by the stupid and the guilty (PC), most people who can think for themselves and see through a charleton steered as far away from this clown as possible.

He wants everything, for nothing, and will rob, lie and steal to get it. A mama's boy trying to be a street punk.

[wad]

I have to shake my head when I read about who is not qualified to be a senator. Look at all the qualified senators we have now and the mess they created

[EyeGuy]

Disclaimer: Please ignore the all too well-known conservative responses below, as they are only a form of self therapy in the face of the usual liberal idiocy:

“I support the concept of man-caused global warming because I want to feel good about myself for saving the planet.”

*****Any and all effects of man on God's environment are at this stage in our development, GROSSLY overstated if not wholly nonexistent.

“I support welfare because the poor need help.”

******Teach a man to fish rather than providing him with the fish already caught, cleaned, breaded, seasoned and pan-fried.

“I support affirmative action because I want to give minorities a boost.”

******Equality of opportunity has existed in this country for decades.

[chatter4]

“Clearly this man is not qualfied to be a Senator

Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution sets three qualifications for senators: 1) each senator must be at least 30 years old, 2) must have been a citizen of the United States for at least the past nine years, and 3) must be (at the time of the election) an inhabitant of the state he or she seeks to represent.”

---

Yes he may be eligible according to the Constitution, but is he qualified to do the job?
qualified
(adjective)
1. having the abilities, qualities, attributes, etc., necessary to perform a particular job or task