[Huck]

I agree with this. Either a procedure is legal or it's not. I don't want the gubmint requiring that I get (and pay for) certain medical services. I thought conservatives were against that sort of thing.

Not when it comes to abortion. Why not require them to get a framed picture of the ultrasound and hang it on their wall for 30 days? Why not require them to see the remains of someone else's abortion?

[ex-snook]

"I thought conservatives were against that sort of thing. "

Hey conservatives are against the government being involved in anything except abortion, oil spills and being the world's policeman.

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

I’m really confused about this Bill! Two days ago, I read here that women would be asked if they wanted to see an ultra-sound. Then earlier today, it was posted that they were required to see an U-S. Now it’s that they’re also required to pay for the U-S. Which version is correct?

[Tucson]

Excellent ideas; we can add those to the bill next legislative session. Thanks for the suggestions.

[RKBA Democrat]

“Why not require them to get a framed picture of the ultrasound and hang it on their wall for 30 days? Why not require them to see the remains of someone else’s abortion?”

Hmm. Not bad ideas. We should look into it.

[valkyry1]

But Roe v Wade should have been turned over in the courts already. Its the judicial legislating from the bench which is unconstitutional.