Both birthers and truthers are nuts.
You’re half right.
The Hawaii DOH has confirmed, in 2 different ways through official communications, that Obama’s Factcheck COLB is a forgery, because
1) the HDOH has made a statutory confirmation that Obama’s COLB is amended. HDOH Administrative Rules, which were illegally hidden until November of 2009, say that all birth certificates must contain note of amendments (and the technical name for a COLB is an “abbreviated birth certificate”). Since the Factcheck COLB doesn’t note the amendment, it is known to be a forgery. And
2) the HDOH has said that all Oahu BC’s were received at the state registrar’s office and given a number by the state registrar on that same day - the “date filed”. Obama’s BC was “filed” on Aug 8, three days before the Nordyke twins’ BC’s were filed, and yet his BC has a higher (later) number than theirs. This statement by the HDOH rules out previous explanations for the discrepancy, since hospitals were given neither pre-numbered BC’s nor blocks of numbers to use and since there weren’t piles sitting around for 3 days awaiting processing at the state registrar’s office. Because the numbers are incompatible, we know that either the date filed or the certificate number is falsified (or both), making the Factcheck COLB a forgery.
More information and documentation is at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
The fact of the matter is that the HDOH has broken numerous laws on Obama’s behalf - possibly including the illegal destruction of permanent records (the original 1961 birth index, the index of foreign births, and the birth certificate of the little girl who was actually given the certificate number that Obama used on his forged COLB).
And more criminal action by the HDOH will almost certainly be revealed very soon.
Obama could never have been elected without a corrupt and criminally-negligent government, media, and law enforcement. This issue is really about the rule of law. See http://www.butterdezillion.wordpress.com for more on why the “birther” issue is not a fringe issue, but the critical, central issue America faces at this time: whether or not we are a nation under the rule of law, or whether we are a mafia-run banana republic.
I should clarify that it is only my suspicion that the BC that the HDOH may have destroyed contains the certificate number that Obama used on his Factcheck forgery.
I know that the birth certificate existed at one point (unless multiple government entities broke the law back in 1961) and that the HDOH claims it doesn’t exist now. The timing of the birth is right for it to have that number. The original 1961 index which the HDOH says doesn’t exist (in which case they illegally destroyed it) would, if not altered as the HDOH has almost certainly altered at least one other index list, would possibly show not only that they had on file a BC for that little girl, but also what certificate number she was given.
Why is the HDOH claiming this girl’s birth record doesn’t exist - which, if true, would mean that they are destroying permanent records of an individual?
“Birthers” would include the founder of FR.
The victory would be very short-lived, as she would crash and burn so hard in November.
But I sincerely doubt she’ll come close to even whiffing victory Tuesday. I think this story is just more media-made drama.