[vladimir998]

You wrote:

“Read paragraphs 11, 13 and 42a.”

Already did - and none of them say what you falsely claimed. We have been through this several times before. And each time anyone demanded evidence of your claims, you failed to post any - because it didn’t exist.

“Or don’t and keep defending the indefensible.”

You are the only one defending the indefensible. That’s why you could never prove your false claims. You failed each and every time.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

It has become painfully obvious that some Roman Catholic apologists can read the black and white print and not understand the words.

Certainly that's the case with Ratzinger's 2001 letter and Crimen Sollicitationis. That's why I linked to both documents and invited anyone to read them for themselves.

Those with eyes to see will read the words the words there which encourage secrecy, lies, cover-ups and evasion.

Others will remain blind.