You wrote:
“lol. No doubt some Roman Catholics believe that. People tend to see what they want to see.”
That would explain why you completely made up what didn’t appear in the actual text.
“I posted then and now Crimen Sollicitationis in its entirety.”
And it did NOT say what you claimed it did. Also, I posted it in its entirety and the follow up document as well. And none of them said what you claimed. That’s why you repeatedly failed to post any evidence for what you claimed it said. Epic fail after epic fail after epic fail.
“Like Ratzinger’s encyclical, the deadly lies are littered throughout.”
Except you couldn’t post any that you claimed.
“I’m content to have people read it for themselves to know the truth.”
Apparently you were content to make claims about it without a single shred of evidence in thread after thread.
“Towards that end, I would encourage RCs to actually read the documents and not just some papist commentary on it.”
And they will discover that what you claimed never once appeared in the document.
Read paragraphs 11, 13 and 42a.
Or don't and keep defending the indefensible.