Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steele not comfortable with Rand Paul’s views on civil rights
ABC ^ | 5/23/10 | Tapper

Posted on 05/23/2010 9:56:18 PM PDT by pissant

In a "This Week" interview Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said he was not comfortable with Rand Paul's views on civil rights. Steele's comments came in a debate with DNC Chairman Tim Kaine. Anchor Jake Tapper asked Steele, “Are you comfortable with” Paul’s views?

“I’m not comfortable with a lot of things,” Steele said.

“It sounds like you’re not comfortable with it,” Tapper said.

“I just said I wasn’t comfortable with it,” Steele replied.

“I think it’s important to understand that Rand Paul has clarified his statement and reiterated his support for…pushing civil rights forward, as opposed to going backwards,” Steele said on This Week. “Any attempt to look backwards is not in the best interest of our country certainly, and certainly not in the best interest of the party,” he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.abcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; michaelsteele; randpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: gwilhelm56; All

.


21 posted on 05/23/2010 11:13:20 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

Steele needs to go after November.


22 posted on 05/23/2010 11:14:04 PM PDT by 506Lake (Complacency is no longer an option, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montag813

But this assclown is comfortable with AL SHARPTON?

**************************

My bet is that the “October surprise” this year will be some deliberate sabotage from lil’ Mikey Tinsel.

Then he will join the Democrats, as Scozzafava did.


23 posted on 05/23/2010 11:18:28 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Let me be clear. The voluntary pancipation of Cinco de Quatro is mandated in all 57 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I’m not sure what Steele is upset about. I heard Paul say that if he had been alive he would have wanted to march with Martin Luther King.


24 posted on 05/23/2010 11:21:13 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Compare Michael Steele’s response to Sarah Palin’s—not even on the same planet:

PALIN: I think Rand Paul is right in his clarifications about what he means and his interpretation of the impacts of the Civil Rights Act. He — he’s right on when he says he is a supporter of civil rights. He’s a supporter of the Civil Rights Act and equal rights. He would have marched with Martin Luther King Jr., he said.

And he will oppose any efforts to diminish or erode away any aspect of the Civil Rights Act, so he’s supportive. And I think there is certainly a double standard at play here.

When Rand Paul had anticipated that he’d be able to engage in a discussion, he being a libertarian-leaning constitutional conservative, being able to engage in a discussion with a TV character, a media personality, who perhaps had an agenda in asking the question and then interpreting his answer the way that she did, he wanted to talk about, evidently, some hypotheticals as it applies to impacts on the Civil Rights Act, as it impacts our Constitution.

So he was given the opportunity finally to clarify, and unequivocally he has stated that he supports the Civil Rights Act.

WALLACE: Do you see some similarities to what politicians and the press did to you in the fall of 2008?

PALIN: Yeah, absolutely. So you know, one thing that we can learn in this lesson that I have learned and Rand Paul is learning now is don’t assume that you can engage in a hypothetical discussion about constitutional impacts with a reporter or a media personality who has an agenda, who may be prejudiced before they even get into the interview in regards to what your answer may be — and then the opportunity that they seize to get you.

You know, they’re looking for that “gotcha” moment. And that’s what it evidently appears to be that they did with Rand Paul, but I’m thankful that he was able to clarify his answer about his support for the Civil Rights Act.


25 posted on 05/23/2010 11:23:31 PM PDT by jonrick46 (We're being water boarded with the sewage of Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Why doesn’t someone use Raid on this frigin cockroach!


26 posted on 05/23/2010 11:29:47 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Someone is trying to stir up the sh!t here. Really, it wasn’t necessary for any other reason to ask Steele to comment on the foot that Rand Paul put in his mouth.


27 posted on 05/23/2010 11:59:48 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46; Travis McGee; Black Agnes

I always hate seeing conservatives wiggle around the CRA...stupid.

CRA was a major stepping stone to the crap we now call the modern world.

why any conservative celebrates it is testimony to how well the Left brainwashed our culture over race

Goldwater and Reagan knew better.

it’s in no danger of appeal..it’s the Holy Grail...I could mine scores of posts from freepers extolling it’s virtues


28 posted on 05/24/2010 12:04:40 AM PDT by wardaddy (never been particularly pious but I stand with Franklin Graham...bigtime...you betcha...ya'll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
The bad part of it is the Left is trying to use the Race Card to hang conservatives. It is sort of racial lynching in reverse.
29 posted on 05/24/2010 12:19:49 AM PDT by jonrick46 (We're being water boarded with the sewage of Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Steele said he was not comfortable with Rand Paul’s views on civil rights.

What did everyone expect from an “affirmative action boob”?

The wealth has not been fully redistributed yet.


30 posted on 05/24/2010 12:54:11 AM PDT by chainsaw ( 'You know that your landing gear is up and locked when it takes full power to taxi to the terminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

As you obviously know, you are exactly right. I was active in politics in 1964 and before and followed all of the debate on the ‘64 civil rights bill. It was the opinion of Goldwater, Reagan, and other conservatives that all those rights were protected in the US Constitution, if enforced, and that to pass a separate civil rights law would make distinctions and create degrees of freedom. Plus, they thought the bill was redundant.

For example, they viewed the bill much as the “Hate Crimes” laws are seen by conservatives today. The end result of murder is death, whether hate was involved or not, and hate crimes are applied or not enforced in a bigoted manner; for instance, take the horrific rape/torture/murders and dismemberment seen in the recent Knoxville, TN court cases, where hate was absolutely a factor in two brutal murders, and hate crimes laws were not enforced because the victims were white!


31 posted on 05/24/2010 1:47:00 AM PDT by Nucluside (ready)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

For God’s sake. Can’t the RNC find some balls and kick this schmuck out and replace him with Ken Blackwell, Haley Barbour, or even...Sarah Palin, the true “Patton” of the Republican Party?


32 posted on 05/24/2010 2:14:26 AM PDT by princeofdarkness ("Obama Lied. Liberty, Morality, and Prosperity Died.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Considering Rand is a Libertarian like his dad, what’s the issue? Can’t they just point that out? And in the same breath they can point out that Bernie Sanders is an actual member of the socialist workers party, which is why some of his views might seems out of bounds with the democratic party.


33 posted on 05/24/2010 3:28:31 AM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nucluside; Travis McGee

yep...and the fat black girl who was there and did participate was just acquitted


34 posted on 05/24/2010 9:41:09 AM PDT by wardaddy (never been particularly pious but I stand with Franklin Graham...bigtime...you betcha...ya'll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson