Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Christian_Capitalist
Well, them, and about 60% of all Kentucky Republicans. Paul beat Grayson by almost 2-to-1, crushing Grayson amongst self-described Conservatives and Moderates and losing to him only amongst self-described Liberals. Suffice it to say, Rand Paul is the overwhelming choice of Kentucky Republicans to represent the great State of Kentucky in the US Senate. So I guess the only question I have is, do YOU support the 2010 Republican US Senate nominee for Kentucky? Or would you rather that Jack Conway took the seat?

His Dad also wins straw polls all the time, do you think that means the great majority of Republicans actually want Ron Paul for President? The Paul family seem to be very good at organizing, but that won't make either of them particularly good general election candidates for statewide offices.

Yes, I would vote for Rand Paul over the Democrat. I just don't think Rand was the better candidate. You watch, it is going to turn out that he will have all sorts of wierd views to defend, wierd associates he will have to explain, etc.

The American public does not want Libertarians. I realize Rand is not his father, but once the public finds out what he really stands for it may just make Rand seriously flawed enough to be vulnerable to the Democrat. The establishment candidate was suitably conservative as I recall, and would probably have coasted into the Senate with no problem.

41 posted on 05/20/2010 8:37:05 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Longbow1969
His Dad also wins straw polls all the time, do you think that means the great majority of Republicans actually want Ron Paul for President?...The American public does not want Libertarians

This was no straw poll.

This was the Republican US Senate Primary.

And as pointed out above, Rand Paul got more Primary votes for US Senator than any statewide Republican candidate in history.

I'd say he enjoys some real support.

42 posted on 05/20/2010 8:47:17 AM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Longbow1969

Greyson was a non-starter. He wouldn’t take a position that even sounded remotely conservative. Earmarks, yeah boy! TARP, you bet! And the list goes on. Greyson was and is the kind of “republican” that most conservatives despise. He tried to talk the talk at election time, but damned if he is going to even consider the walk.


43 posted on 05/20/2010 8:54:56 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Longbow1969
The establishment candidate was suitably conservative as I recall, and would probably have coasted into the Senate with no problem.

Even if he did, what use it is to put another RINO in the Senate? Lord knows we have plenty already....

44 posted on 05/20/2010 9:24:02 AM PDT by reaganairport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Longbow1969
Yes, I would vote for Rand Paul over the Democrat. I just don't think Rand was the better candidate.

You are going to be very pleasantly surprised, even thrilled at Senator Paul's performance.

49 posted on 05/20/2010 10:29:14 AM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson