Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Anyone outraged by this article? If so pass it along, because the idea that you can search without a warrant, seize w/o a warrant, based on no crime, only the offerings of another that a man may be nuts is NUTS. Now if he were nuts, and based on some type of reasoned SOP than I MIGHT entertain the discussion of the ability of the police to do this. But, not to remove his legally obtained weapons, this is just NUTS.

SWAT, what if he hadn't complied peacefully, it appears without a crime, they sure thought it was possible.

It is worthy of a second read. Love the idea that this may rise to "kidnapping"

If it can happen there, it can happen anywhere. I am going to call our local cops to see what the SOP is here, offering to send this article as the purpose of my inquiry.

Stunning article.

~FMC

1 posted on 05/19/2010 2:39:43 PM PDT by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
Just damn...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
View past Libertarian pings here
28 posted on 05/19/2010 3:02:31 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

I almost always defend the police.

Not this time. This was a violent kidnapping.


30 posted on 05/19/2010 3:05:40 PM PDT by Grunthor (Over YOUR dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Oregon Department of Transportation

Hmmmm....A government department, go figure.

He should sue, as it sounds like his “constitutional” rights, we severely violated.


31 posted on 05/19/2010 3:11:48 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (I'll just say the 2nd amendment to the Constitution is there for a reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Accordingly to the Libs, Arizona has become a Nazi state.

Meanwhile, over in Oregon ...


32 posted on 05/19/2010 3:12:18 PM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Anyone outraged by this article? If so pass it along, because the idea that you can search without a warrant, seize w/o a warrant, based on no crime, only the offerings of another that a man may be nuts is NUTS. Now if he were nuts, and based on some type of reasoned SOP than I MIGHT entertain the discussion of the ability of the police to do this. But, not to remove his legally obtained weapons, this is just NUTS.

Well, no. It's criminal conduct. And FELONY criminal conduct, at that.

Title 18, United States Code, U.S. Criminal Code Section 242:
Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;

and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap,
aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

33 posted on 05/19/2010 3:16:03 PM PDT by archy (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

RKBA bump.


37 posted on 05/19/2010 3:32:01 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (There is no right to do wrong. Those who claim there is destroy the foundations of true liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
I think we have a clue as to the problem:

the process stipulated in the union contract

42 posted on 05/19/2010 3:48:12 PM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

That dude needs to lawyer up and civily prosecute the Roid heads.


44 posted on 05/19/2010 3:51:32 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick; CodeToad

Dept. of Pre-Crime.


45 posted on 05/19/2010 3:53:38 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Anyone outraged by this article?

Is outraged the same as disgruntled. Don't want to be carted off by thugs.

47 posted on 05/19/2010 3:55:44 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts


52 posted on 05/19/2010 4:06:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Don't care if he was born in a manger on July 4th! A "Natural Born" citizen requires two US parents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
...only the offerings of another that a man may be nuts is NUTS.

Maybe I missed it but I didn't see anywhere in the article who alleged he was nuts or on what basis. I think everyone involved in this should lose their jobs and be barred from ever working as police officers or in any civil service job.

53 posted on 05/19/2010 4:09:32 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Anyone outraged by this article?


Outraged, livid, pissed... Liberty-raping jackboots need to be stopped, NOW!

57 posted on 05/19/2010 4:16:25 PM PDT by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick; All

Folks, going in I’m going to tell you that I think we have over-swat teamed ourselves to the point of absurdity. Our federal government is out of control. There are definitely some serious problems in this area.

That being said, what would have been our reaction if this department had been warned, did nothing, then this guy went out and killed people setting up a hostage situation? Wouldn’t we have been angry about that too? I am reminded of the shooter at Fort Hood.

That may be a bad example, because I believe that guy was clearly headed for trouble, and yet nobody did anything.
Isn’t it possible this guy showed some very concerning warning signals too? We’re not privy to all the information on this yet are we?

Even people with no record go off sometimes. What’s the solution to this? We had officers to up to a home up near Valencia about seven years ago, and the occupant opened fire on the officers, so you can’t just waltz up to someone’s door and try to ask them questions in all instances either.


65 posted on 05/19/2010 4:46:21 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Excusaholic: MeCain lost to Jr., RINO endorsements are flying, & you live at 2012 Denial Blvd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

Sounds like the minority report movie. Catch the perp before they do it.


80 posted on 05/19/2010 5:22:17 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Bloom says the police are permitted to decide on their own to take someone in for an evaluation, and that there’s no requirement that they first consult with a judge or a mental health professional.

WOW! Talk about 'profiling'. And lack of due process.

Yes, I am outraged, FMC. Sadly, my sense of outrage has been dulled over the decades by the shenanigans at all levels of law enforcement, from local police right up to the FBI, BATF, and CIA. Of course, the CIA is not chartered to act as law enforcement within the United States, but it cheerfully does so anyway.

How about this rationale?: "Hey, he looks like one of those disgruntled white male extremists! You know, the kind Janet Napoleonato warned us about."

82 posted on 05/19/2010 5:26:16 PM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (BORDERS, LAWS and LANGUAGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick
Yes it is outrageous. You may not get a lot of comments as it's been discussed a number of times.

Not being the posting police, just don't be surprised if it doesn't get the attention that it deserves.

83 posted on 05/19/2010 5:26:50 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

BTTT!


87 posted on 05/19/2010 5:47:49 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

ping


90 posted on 05/19/2010 6:04:46 PM PDT by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Military Chick

The lawyer is barking up the wrong tree with the kidnapping IMHO. They should look at Violation of Civil Rights Under Color of Law, 18 USC 242. Normal immunities don’t apply, either. Again, IMHO.


95 posted on 05/19/2010 8:27:34 PM PDT by piytar (Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson