I just heard it, too.
The jury’s out. No rejoicing, I assume, until he wins the general election. He’ll be painted as a wacko.
I fully disagree with libertarian pro-choice positions. Pre-birth life is still life and in possession of all rights granted by the Creator.
One has to believe that the fetus is equal to a pimple or mole in order to be pro-choice. But when you ask a pro-choicer if that is what they believe, they will deny it. Essentially, pro-choicers see the fetus in the same way slaveowners saw slaves, human but not enough of one to have its own rights.
From slavery to abortion, we really have not progressed at all have we?
Your post is kind of ambiguous as to whether that's a comment against liberterianism in general or if it's more specifically leveled at Rand Paul, but this is his stance on life...
There are many libertarians who are pro-life.
...Randall Paul is pro-life...
Oh, shut up. Mr. Paul's father is not pro-genocide, I'm sure he didn't train his son to be pro-genocide and neither are the ones of us who would be your allies.