did he really suggest that or was he trying to make a point about liberal hypocrisy and diversity?
That's how I read it.
I’m sure he meant it. If you buy into the lib argument that the Supreme Court should represent the diversity of America, then this Court does not represent the religious diversity of America, and it is getting less so. After Kagan takes the bench, the Court will consist entirely of Jews and Catholics.
Of course, I could care less. The issue for me is judicial philosophy. But if you’re a liberal and you’re not a hypocrite, then I would think you would have a problem with that.
That’s what I got from it - that the court is getting packed with leftist homos and eshewing our Christian European majority.
I think it has been 50 years since the Dems nominated one.