I’m sure he meant it. If you buy into the lib argument that the Supreme Court should represent the diversity of America, then this Court does not represent the religious diversity of America, and it is getting less so. After Kagan takes the bench, the Court will consist entirely of Jews and Catholics.
Of course, I could care less. The issue for me is judicial philosophy. But if you’re a liberal and you’re not a hypocrite, then I would think you would have a problem with that.
If she is in the IV League left wing inner circle then her religion is socialism.
Of course, I could care less. The issue for me is judicial philosophy
Which is why I detest the exclusivity of the nations's highest court being comprised solely of Harvardites and Yalies.
I think non-lawyers should be represented on the bench.
First, law school is easy and is reserved for people who are too stupid to do mathematics.
Second, the law is a corrupt incestuous protection racket.
There is no reason that this single profession should have exclusive province over one-third of our representative republic, especially a third that has increasingly decided that it can arbitrarily override the wishes of the elected legislature based only on their desires and whims.
It is time we put people in black robes who will hold these people accountable.