You claimed that Stevens was a Catholic. I would say that you are either willfully ignorant or trying to excuse your deliberate misrepresentation of the man's religion. Either way, you have your facts wrong.
So, I guess you find it discriminatory that there are no Protestant Christians on the US Supreme Court? Is that your complaint?
I find it highly suspect to the point of obvious discrimination that a white Christian has not been nominated for the Supreme Court by the Democrats in nearly 50 years. They have room for everyone else, but white Christians. Mr. Buchanan correctly points out that the Democrats have been redlining the Supreme Court, preventing the nomination of white Christians. Who sits on the nomination committee? Those names should be part of the public record. I wonder what reasons they would provide for excluding the majority of Americans in favor of ethnic and religious minorities.
What evidence do you have that Ms. Kagan was selected because she was Jewish (or rather, not Protestant Christian), instead of her desireable-to-Obama qualities of being a flaming marxist who hates men and desires to destroy this nation?
None, of course.
She was selected because she was a radical.
The only people her Jewish ethnicity (certainly not her religious practice, as she is non-observant) are relevant to are anti-semites like Pat Buchanon -— well, and you.
Blah, blah, blah. You have no idea why she was nominated. You keep wanting to play the anti-semite card. Abe Foxman would be proud to know that he has fans here at Free Republic.
Only you care whether or not she practices Judaism or identifies as a Jew.
The point of the article is the Democrats exclude white Christians, which you seem to have no problem with.
“The point of the article is the Democrats exclude white Christians, which you seem to have no problem with.”
No, the point of the article is there are too many Jewish people, which is irrelevant — well, except to bigots.
The problem is there are too many atheist liberals of whatever origin.