What discrimination?
Exactly. You are willfully blind to it.
Buchanan lays it out and you claim to not understand while accusing Buchanan of "racism and bigotry" all the while mocking those who are being systematically disenfranchised.
Look, the problem with Kagan is she is a secularist elite from the Northeast snob section of the USA. No different than Episopalian Souter or Roman Catholic Stevens.
You were so eager in your desire to smear Buchanan that you either didn't read or comprehend the article. The whole point of the article is that Stevens is the last protestant on the Supreme Court.
Sorry, I don’t pretend to understand Christian denominations.
So, I guess you find it discriminatory that there are no Protestant Christians on the US Supreme Court? Is that your complaint?
What evidence do you have that Ms. Kagan was selected because she was Jewish (or rather, not Protestant Christian), instead of her desireable-to-Obama qualities of being a flaming marxist who hates men and desires to destroy this nation?
None, of course.
She was selected because she was a radical.
The only people her Jewish ethnicity (certainly not her religious practice, as she is non-observant) are relevant to are anti-semites like Pat Buchanon -— well, and you.