Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator

That’s a bit hyperbolic.

If her family goes a long way back in the San Antonio area, she should research which side her ancestors took up in that conflict. From what I’ve read it was about 50/50 ... those who wanted to become part of Texas, and those who wanted Mexico to prevail.

I agree with her only to the extent that it was a classic fight over territory and dominion and that the textbooks and history make it sound like it was more than that.


27 posted on 05/13/2010 6:54:02 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne
I agree with her only to the extent that it was a classic fight over territory and dominion and that the textbooks and history make it sound like it was more than that.

It was "more than that". The defenders of the Alamo chose to die to the last man rather than surrender or abandon the fort. It is a battle unique in American history. One does not sacrifice one's life merely for profit or territory.

76 posted on 05/13/2010 7:40:52 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson