Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crunk
Both Palin and Romney chose to support the people who have the best chance of knocking off the democrats in CA, Fiorina and Whitman. And, they were both swayed by, among other things, personal friendship and loyalty.

Actually Palin waited until the last 4 weeks, saw that proabortion/gay marriage, Tom Campbell was breezing to a win, and she stepped in to stop it.

Romney is the guy that mentored Meg Whitman and helped push her to run as a Tom Campbell like liberal, Romney ran Whitman to shut out any conservatives from the primary.

Palin is trying to take the Senate seat and get a more conservative, pro life candidate in, Romney initiated a plan to take over the California Governor's seat and keep it out of the hands of a pro lifer.

42 posted on 05/07/2010 11:25:37 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney-"I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
WRONG! THERE WAS NO VIABLE PRO-LIFE CANDIDATE FOR GOVERNOR IN CALIFORNIA. So, whether you like it or not, it is exactly the same thing. They both chose to support the most conservative candidate who could actually WIN - and they both happen to be friends with those candidates (Palin newly befriended Fiorina while Romney has been friends with Whitman for ovr 25 years).
77 posted on 05/08/2010 7:24:53 AM PDT by crunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson